<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 06/02/2016 05:50 AM, Rostislav
Svoboda wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:1536002464.1814478.1464861048470.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com"
type="cite">
<div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif;
font-size: 12pt; color: #000000">
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><span name="x"></span>Rostislav Svoboda<br>
Principal JBoss QA Engineer<span name="x"></span><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<hr id="zwchr">
<blockquote style="border-left:2px solid
#1010FF;margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px;color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;">
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 06/01/2016 05:20 PM, Alessio
Soldano wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:574F5196.4090907@redhat.com">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Il 01/06/2016 20:16, Ron Sigal
ha scritto:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:c26971bd-dcb0-8aeb-4f75-1a4702ce7595@redhat.com"><br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:1662693582.1399492.1464789426729.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com">
<pre>ARQ + Undertow know each other: <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://arquillian.org/modules/undertow-embedded-container-adapter/" target="_blank">http://arquillian.org/modules/undertow-embedded-container-adapter/</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
My first inclination, like Weinan's, was to think that
running everything in Wildfly was pretty heavy, but if we
just start Wildfly once, that's not so bad.</blockquote>
Right, that's what I meant saying that it depends on how you
implement the solution. In practice, we might end up needing
more than just a single WFLY instance (perhaps because we
need different container configurations for different types
of tests), but the number of instances should really be
limited (let's say less than 5?).<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:c26971bd-dcb0-8aeb-4f75-1a4702ce7595@redhat.com">
After all, that's what the TCK does, as well as the new qe
TS.</blockquote>
And the JBossWS testsuite ;)<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:c26971bd-dcb0-8aeb-4f75-1a4702ce7595@redhat.com">
One problem I still have is that, when I'm working on a
problem, I MUCH prefer running tests in an embedded
container like tjws or Undertow.</blockquote>
Not sure what the preference is based on, but if that's
because you don't want to manually start the container,
etc... Arquillian does that for you.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I just like the instantaneous startup. For example, I just ran
a test in RESTEASY-TEST-WF8, and it took 2.7 seconds to start
up Wildfly and another 2.7 seconds to create and deploy the
WAR. Better than AS 5 ;-) but still a little annoying.<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>If you do TS properly you need to start WF just once so I
don't see this as a problem.<br>
</div>
<div>Starting WF for each test is bad practice.<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
I'm not worried about the testsuite as a whole. It's when I'm
running the same test over and over that it's an issue. Right now
the arquillian tests use a managed Wildfly, but I guess there could
be a profile for a remote Wildfly. Anyway, what I'll probably end up
doing is writing a standalone test while I'm working on something,
then turning it into a WF test later. Not a big deal.<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:1536002464.1814478.1464861048470.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com"
type="cite">
<div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif;
font-size: 12pt; color: #000000">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>R.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<blockquote style="border-left:2px solid
#1010FF;margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px;color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;">
<blockquote cite="mid:574F5196.4090907@redhat.com"><br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:c26971bd-dcb0-8aeb-4f75-1a4702ce7595@redhat.com">
I guess I could just write a standalone test and then turn
it into an arquillian test when I'm done. But if
Arquillian works with Undertow, which I didn't know, that
might be the best of all worlds.</blockquote>
I've never tried this, but afaiu yes it works with Undertow.<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:c26971bd-dcb0-8aeb-4f75-1a4702ce7595@redhat.com">
I'm a little worried though about the time it takes
Arquillian to create a WAR, which isn't insignificant ...<br>
</blockquote>
It's not that bad after all; btw, once you have all tests as
arquillian ones and you ensure they do not make assumptions
on the server being there just for each of them (which is
also good), you can most likely make the testsuite execution
concurrent and run multiple tests at the same time.<br>
<br>
Cheers<br>
Alessio<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature">--
Alessio Soldano
Web Service Lead, JBoss</pre>
<br>
<br>
<pre>_______________________________________________
resteasy-dev mailing list
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:resteasy-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">resteasy-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/resteasy-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/resteasy-dev</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature">--
My company's smarter than your company (unless you work for Red Hat)</pre>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
resteasy-dev mailing list<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:resteasy-dev@lists.jboss.org">resteasy-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/resteasy-dev">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/resteasy-dev</a><br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
My company's smarter than your company (unless you work for Red Hat)</pre>
</body>
</html>