<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>Thanks for having shared this, Ron.<br></div>Do you expect us having to revisit any of the decisions we have taken so far regarding issues related to cookies?<br></div>Cheers<br></div>Alessio<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:41 AM, Ron Sigal <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rsigal@redhat.com" target="_blank">rsigal@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">We've talked in the past about the ambiguity in the JAX-RS spec<br>
concerning cookies. I just noticed this issue:<br>
<br>
<a href="https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBEAP-11442" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://issues.jboss.org/<wbr>browse/JBEAP-11442</a> "[GSS](7.0.z) Add<br>
optional support for RFC6265 compliant cookie validation"<br>
<br>
Not that there's anything we need to do about.I just thought it might be<br>
worth knowing about.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
My company's smarter than your company (unless you work for Red Hat)<br>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
resteasy-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:resteasy-dev@lists.jboss.org">resteasy-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/resteasy-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/resteasy-dev</a><br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>