Adopting CKEditor 4

[Lukáš Fryč]

It definitely makes sense.

Note that Ace also powers alternative GitHub/Gist editing mode.

It seems it is targeted on "coders for coders" kind of projects.




On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 4:33 AM, Rodney Russ <rruss at redhat.com> wrote:

> Do you guys think there is any value in providing Ace (the open source,
> source code editor used in Cloud 9) as a component?
>
> http://ace.c9.io
>
> Just curious, really.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Lukáš Fryč" <lukas.fryc at gmail.com>
> > To: richfaces-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 7:58:46 AM
> > Subject: Adopting CKEditor 4
> >
> >
> >
> > Hey guys,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I have evaluated CKEditor in version 4 as we are going to update in
> > RichFaces 5.
> >
> >
> > Note: RichFaces 4 use CKEditor 3.x
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The issue is tracked here:
> >
> >
> > https://github.com/richwidgets/richwidgets/issues/175
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Notable additions:
> > =============
> >
> >
> > * CKEditor now has new inline mode which works with contenteditable
> > areas http://ckeditor.com/demo#widgets
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Caveats:
> > ======
> >
> >
> > Skins:
> > ---------
> > The skins known from CKEditor 3 are NOT part of CKEditor 4.
> >
> >
> > There is a new Moono skin that is the only one that is bundled with a
> > distribution. There is a ported Kama style that isn't part of
> > distribution.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I think we should go with this default option and see whether it
> > poses a problem for our users. If they want, they can always attach
> > any other skin.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> >
> > ~ Lukas
> > _______________________________________________
> > richfaces-dev mailing list
> > richfaces-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/richfaces-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/richfaces-dev/attachments/20140212/4d9aaa66/attachment.html