[richfaces-svn-commits] JBoss Rich Faces SVN: r13381 - trunk/docs/cdkguide/en/src/main/docbook/modules.

[richfaces-svn-commits at lists.jboss.org]

Author: artdaw
Date: 2009-04-03 13:05:33 -0400 (Fri, 03 Apr 2009)
New Revision: 13381

Modified:
   trunk/docs/cdkguide/en/src/main/docbook/modules/ide.xml
Log:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/RF-5969 - 'Creating projects in different IDEs' chapter

Modified: trunk/docs/cdkguide/en/src/main/docbook/modules/ide.xml
===================================================================
--- trunk/docs/cdkguide/en/src/main/docbook/modules/ide.xml	2009-04-03 16:58:37 UTC (rev 13380)
+++ trunk/docs/cdkguide/en/src/main/docbook/modules/ide.xml	2009-04-03 17:05:33 UTC (rev 13381)
@@ -17,13 +17,15 @@
 	    <property><emphasis role="bold">&lt;rich:inputDate&gt;</emphasis></property> component.
 	    However when creating components in the wild you need debugger, class browser, 
 	    object inspector, class hierarchy diagram, etc.
-	    to simplify development process and maximize developer productivity. 
+	    to simplify development process and maximize productivity. 
 	    In other words you need an IDE. 
     </para>
     <para>
     	The question is what IDE is more suitable for the JSF component development.
     	There is no one answer for this question and the right of private judgment in matters of choosing IDE, 
-    	is better secured to us than to any other people in the world.    
+    	is better secured to us than to any other people in the world.
+    </para>
+    <para>    
     	Eclipse IDE seems to be more preferable for the rapid component creation process.
     </para>
     
@@ -35,4 +37,4 @@
     		and in <ulink url="http://www.jboss.org/tools">JBoss Tools</ulink>. 
     	</para>
     </tip>
-</chapter>
\ No newline at end of file
+</chapter>