[rules-dev] Compiler API - changes?

[Michael Neale]

Or, should we change the descrs to look like that?
how does that relate to the descrs?

On 2/28/07, Peter Lin <woolfel at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> although drools-compiler has the descr classes, it would be nice to have
> an Rule Object Model like the one I showed you guys.
>
> this way, a condition would be represented by a condition object like this
>
> public class Condition {
>
>     /**
>      * Added the attribute to make it easier to compile the rule to
>      * java code
>      */
>     private String objectType;
>     /**
>      * if the attribute is bound to a variable, the method
>      * should return the name of the variable.
>      */
>     private String boundVariable;
>     /**
>      * the attribute of the object to match on
>      */
>     private String attribute;
>     /**
>      * the operator for the condition, which may be ==, !=
>      * <, >, <=, >=, <>
>      */
>     private String operator;
>     /**
>      * The timestamp of the last change made to the condition.
>      * this attribute is optional and is meant to make it
>      * easier to run queries on the rules by timestamp
>      */
>     private long timestamp;
>     /**
>      * the value of the condition
>      */
>     private String value;
>     /**
>      * the value can be either a single literal value or a list
>      * of values of the same type
>      */
>     private String valueType = null;
>     /**
>      * the version of the condition. for advanced reporting, it's
>      * easier if the condition is tagged with a version number.
>      */
>     private String version;
> }
>
> I'm totally bias, but it would make writing tools easier. things like rule
> repo, validation, impact analysis, queries and reporting simpler :)
>
>
> peter
>
> On 2/27/07, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org> wrote:
> >
> >  Suggest away.
> >
> > Mark
> > Michael Neale wrote:
> >
> > Guys - are there going to be any changes to the compiler API now? Cause
> > now is the time to fix/change it if needed.
> >
> > I have some suggestions if anyone is interested.
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-dev mailing list
> >
> > rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-dev mailing list
> > rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20070228/67511846/attachment.html