[rules-dev] Conway example - update to use ruleflow

[Mark Proctor]

No I only did agenda groups. Key part to the "port" is to share code, so 
we still have examples for agenda-groups, don't want to loose those. 
Probalby create a factory of some sort to abstract away the parts in 
conway that do any rule stuff, so a switch can specify whether the 
factory is ruleflowgroup or agenda groups.

Mark
Michael Neale wrote:
> Hi Michael.
>
> I think Mark was working on a "stateful" conways example (the old was 
> stateless) - I wasn't sure if he got to using ruleflow (just check 
> first).
>
> Ruleflow is probably very useful to most people who would have used 
> agenda-groups - agenda-groups are a stack, which is not intuitive to 
> most people, but ruleflows are more imperative, so examples showing 
> that are appreciated. I would almost go as far as to say that *most* 
> of the time when you want control, you want ruleflow (you will know if 
> you want agenda). Correct me if I am wrong, ruleflow is new to me !
>
> Michael.
>
> On 5/16/07, *Anstis, Michael (M.)* <manstis1 at ford.com 
> <mailto:manstis1 at ford.com>> wrote:
>
>     Just to let you know I am updating the example to use ruleflow (it
>     looks like one or more rules are wrong too as the "glider" doesn't
>     glide, so I'll have a look at these also).
>
>     Doesn't look particularly taxing so should have it done very soon
>     - provided the wife doesn't complain that she's not seeing much of
>     me in the evenings ;-)
>
>     With kind regards,
>
>     Mike
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     rules-dev mailing list
>     rules-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20070518/51d40fc7/attachment.html