[rules-dev] BRMS and Fit for Rules

[JoelA]

Is there anything more to add on this? 

We are in the same situation as Paul and are considering elaborating
fit-for-rules or writing our own fit/fitnesse stuff (maybe more like
Servicefixture). We hope to have business types take care of testing their
rules based on pkgs dev provides them.

I've also read this post:

http://blog.athico.com/2007/12/testing-rules-introduction.html

What's the status on this 'integrated testing tool' mentioned in the blog?

Joel 



Paul Browne wrote:
> 
> As part of the some 'stuff' (you may be able to guess!) found myself r
> needing to integrate FIT for Rules and the BRMS. No big deal in doing 
> the integration, just plugged in a new BRMSEngine fixture instead of the 
> existing Engine fixture.
> 
> Two questions
> a) This code is generic - would you be interested in a copy for the Fit 
> for Rules project? There are other (minor) updates to the code.
> or
> b) Do you have something big up your sleeve that will (soon) make this 
> redundant (i.e. the QA Tab on the BRMS). Trouble is , would like to 
> write this up now(!). Am I right in assuming the 'QA' tab will 
> effectively be Fit for Rules integrated into the BRMS? (in which case 
> the samples will be easy to port later).
> 
> Ta
> 
> Paul
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/BRMS-and-Fit-for-Rules-tp15334736p16442903.html
Sent from the drools - dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.