[rules-dev] KnowledgeBase

[Michael Neale]

Also things in the future like neural nets and other potentially  
learned data. I guess whatever we call it it will be the deployable unit


Sent from my iPhone

On 04/01/2008, at 5:48, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org> wrote:

> Vineet Khosla wrote:
>> Peter Jackson supports the wiki concept. Knowledge base has 'both  
>> rules and various declarations'.
>> Lets keep it 'rule base'.
> rule base isn't so appropriate now, as we also have  Processes in  
> it. We already have functions, and soon enough we'll also add in  
> Templates for class definitions (already there, but not exposed).
>>
>> Vineet
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Massi Gmail <mmquelo at gmail.com>
>> To: rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2008 5:49:23 AM
>> Subject: Re: [rules-dev] KnowledgeBase
>>
>>
>> Reading the wikipedia doc, It seems that a knowledgebase does not  
>> only contain data in a "Rule Format" but
>> even other kind of information. For instance information like the  
>> "object model".
>>
>> As far as I understood the rulebase does not contain anything  
>> related to the object\fact model.
>>
>> So I would say that the rulebase is "part of" the knowledge base  
>> and not the "knowledgebase" itself.
>>
>> It's just an idea....
>>
>> Massi
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  
>> Try it now.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20080108/67a8aa32/attachment.html