[rules-dev] Drools ReteOO versus Rete

[Edson Tirelli]

    James,

    I believe this was related to Drools 2.
    What exactly is your problem?

    []s
    Edson

2009/8/14 James Owen <jco2009 at att.net>

> Greetings:
> Just wondering if this link still applies.  If so, I think I may have found
> an answer to one of my benchmark problems.
>
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/DROOLS/Rete+Vs+Reteoo
>
> SDG
> James Owen
> Founder October Rules Fest
> Senior Consultant / Architect KBSC
> http://www.kbsc.com
> http://www.OctoberRulesFest.org
> Twitter: OctRulesFest
> Blogs:
> http://JavaRules.blogspot.com [Rulebased Systems Blog]
> http://ORF2009.blogspot.com [October Rules Fest Blog]
> http://exscg.blogspot.com/ [Expert Systems Consulting Group Blog]
>
> *"If I have seen a little further it is by standing on the shoulders of
> giants."*
> *Sir Isaac Newton in a letter to Robert Hooke, 5 Feb 1676*
> *
> *
> *Come to October Rules Fest and stand on the shoulders of the Giants of
> the industry; if only for a week.*
>
>
>
> On Aug 13, 2009, at 8:21 AM, mrhoden at franklinamerican.com wrote:
>
> Depending on your number of rules and facts, that amount of memory
> will likely be a concern. If I had memory requirements like that I
> would honestly look a clips.
>
> -Michael
>
> On Aug 13, 2009, at 2:19 AM, Thomas Frenken <Thomas.Frenken at offis.de>
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
> I am interested in running Drools 5 (and especially Drools Fusion)
>
> on a
>
> somehow<< resource-constrained device for which only a J2SE 1.4 VM
>
> ist
>
> available.
>
>
> Since Drools meanwhile requires J2SE 1.5 I thought about backporting
>
> it.
>
> But before I invest so much effort, I got two questions:
>
>
> 1) I have downloaded the sourcecode. At a first glance the only
>
> reason for
>
> requiering J2SE 1.5 is the extensive use of generics. In case I would
>
> remove all generics from the code, would it be possible to compile
>
> drools
>
> for a J2SE 1.4 VM runtime in general or are there other more hidden
>
> reasons for requiering J2SE 1.5?
>
> 2)  I already meantioned I am planning to run drools on a >>somehow<<
>
> resourcen-constrained device. I explicitly used the term >>somehow<<
>
> because I am talking of a device with a 400 Mhz CPU and 256 MB RAM
>
> (some
>
> people might laugh about calling this resource-constrained). How about
>
> resource-consumption of drools? Has anyone run drools on a device with
>
> similar resources?
>
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
>
> Best Regards
>
> Thomas Frenken
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> rules-dev mailing list
>
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>


-- 
 Edson Tirelli
 JBoss Drools Core Development
 JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20090814/9eb63506/attachment.html