[rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is nownamedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?

[Michael Neale]

hahaha...

to be fair, that stupid OS-X "feature" made me scratch my head for a few
hours once, thinking our build was doing something wrong...

On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org> wrote:

>  This is quite funny, the longest debate we've had on dev mailing list for
> a while, and it's about the naming of a jar :)
>
> Mark
>
> On 05/08/2010 12:48, Michael Neale wrote:
>
> thankfully it didn't do that...
>
>  but not naming the folder drools-guvnor.war tripped me enough enough
> times that I still remember it.
>
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Anstis, Michael (M.) <manstis1 at ford.com>wrote:
>
>>  ..and unzip the jars in WEB-INF\lib? ;-)
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>>  *From:* rules-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org [mailto:
>> rules-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Michael Neale
>>  *Sent:* 05 August 2010 12:06
>> *To:* Rules Dev List
>> *Subject:* Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is
>> nownamedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
>>
>>   no I think it was more that OS-X finder would unzip the zip, and then
>> unzip the war, and you end up with a drools-guvnor directory... confuses
>> people.
>>
>>  Distributing it as a war makes sense.
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Anstis, Michael (M.) <manstis1 at ford.com>wrote:
>>
>>>  So, <artifact>-<version>.war without zip then?
>>>
>>> (Says he with little experience of maven packaging)
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------
>>> *From:* rules-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org [mailto:
>>> rules-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Michael Neale
>>> *Sent:* 05 August 2010 11:47
>>> *To:* Rules Dev List
>>> *Subject:* Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is now
>>> namedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
>>>
>>>   yeah zipping the war sometimes caused hassles for OS-X users (I know
>>> tripped me up) so its a good thing to do this (but want to set the web
>>> context or rename when deploying !).
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org>wrote:
>>>
>>>>  On 05/08/2010 11:18, Anstis, Michael (M.) wrote:
>>>> > I like the new format - I like version numbers in filenames so you can
>>>> > differentiate.
>>>> >
>>>> > I can always change the web-context at deployment time if I like.
>>>>  Previuosly it was
>>>> drools-guvnor-5.1.0.zip
>>>>  -- drools-guvnor.war
>>>>
>>>> So the zip was versioned, just the contained .war wasn't. I didn't see
>>>> the point in zipping a single war. But I can move back to that, so the
>>>> main download artifact is versioned, but the war isn't....
>>>>
>>>> Mark
>>>>  > -----Original Message-----
>>>> > From: rules-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org
>>>> > [mailto:rules-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Mark Proctor
>>>> > Sent: 05 August 2010 11:15
>>>> > To: rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> > Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is now namedas
>>>> > drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >    On 05/08/2010 10:11, Jervis Liu wrote:
>>>> >> Hi, just found that Guvnor 5.1 war file is now named as
>>>> >> drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war? This way users have to change the default
>>>> url
>>>> >> to things like http://localhost:8080/drools-5.1.0-guvnor. Is this a
>>>> >> mistake or intended?
>>>> > Previously it was a versioned zip that had an unversioned war in it.
>>>> As
>>>> > a war is already compressed it seemed pointless compressing it in
>>>> > another archive.
>>>> >
>>>> > Users can just rename the .war if they like, stripping the version. Or
>>>> > we can change it back to placing hte .war inside of the .zip.
>>>> >
>>>> > What do people want?
>>>> >
>>>> > Mark
>>>> >> Cheers,
>>>> >> Jervis
>>>> >>
>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>> >> rules-dev mailing list
>>>> >> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > rules-dev mailing list
>>>> > rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > rules-dev mailing list
>>>> > rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Michael D Neale
>>> home: www.michaelneale.net
>>> blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Michael D Neale
>> home: www.michaelneale.net
>> blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Michael D Neale
> home: www.michaelneale.net
> blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing listrules-dev at lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>


-- 
Michael D Neale
home: www.michaelneale.net
blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20100806/e45dc861/attachment.html