[rules-dev] Another mvel problem - see user list, today

[Wolfgang Laun]

Thank you!
-W

On 21 August 2011 21:00, Mario Fusco <mario.fusco at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org>wrote:
>
>>  On 19/08/2011 20:44, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
>>
>> On 19 August 2011 18:07, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>  Mike just won't explore bugs, without unit tests. Once a unit test is
>>> in place he's responsive in fixing it. Which is fair enough.
>>>
>>
>> The point is that for me (and presumably most other Drools users) the step
>> from a DRL construct towards an MVEL unit test isn't a simple one.
>> -W
>>
>> We can't write all the software ourselves, we have to re-use OSS libraries
>> and be a part of those communities, and the baggage that comes with them.
>>
>> We've hired Mario full time, who is now responsible for this area. So that
>> should atleast help in some aspect, as we can be more pro-active in
>> ownership of MVEL issues.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>
> The problem seems caused by MVEL not properly managing methods accepting a
> varargs.
> I created a failing test and sent a pull request including it:
> https://github.com/mvel/mvel/pull/11
>
> As Mark wrote, in future I will try to help Mike in testing and possibly
> fixing those MVEL issues.
>
> Mario
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20110822/8cd856f5/attachment.html