[rules-dev] Moving drools-factconstraints

[Toni Rikkola]

It should be possible to keep drools-verifier in the drools repo. Doing some changes to support this right now.

Toni

On Feb 6, 2011, at 11:17 AM, Geoffrey De Smet wrote:

> After the split-up drools-verifier is suppose to go into the drools repo 
> and ide-common is suppose to go into the guvnor repo.
> 
> So drools-verifier can not depend on ide-common.
> Is that an option, Toni?
> 
> With kind regards,
> Geoffrey De Smet
> 
> Op 04-02-11 23:20, Esteban Aliverti schreef:
>> @Geoffrey I started working on this issue. Here is the associated jira
>> issue https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-1186
>> <https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-1186>The problem is that
>> drools-factconstraints depended on drools-verifier and drools-verifier
>> depends on drools-ide-common. So, if I move drools-factconstraints into
>> drools-ide-common, I will get a cyclic dependency error (because
>> drools-ide-commons will depend on drools-verifier and drools-verifier
>> depends on drools-ide-common).
>> One solution (and maybe the easiest one) could be to move
>> drools-factconstraints into drools-verifier. What do you think about
>> this Toni?
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> 
>> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>> 
>> Esteban Aliverti
>> - Developer @ http://www.plugtree.com <http://www.plugtree.com>
>> - Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev