[rules-dev] Guvnor build problems?

[Michael Anstis]

Hi Ge0ffrey,

>Does it occur in hosted mode in Eclipse/IntelliJ?
>Looks like the test classes are also copied into the war?!?
>Tihomir might know more about the whole role based stuff.

- It occurs when deploying to Tomcat (any Servlet Container?).
- The WAR *does* contain all "test" classes\resources.
- It does not occur in hosted mode (as I can remove "test" classes\resources
from the classpath).
- Seam is correct in reporting the error (as two classes are declared as
being the same component, because of the inclusion of "test" classes).

So I'd surmise a compile problem with maven (but it could be old news)?

With kind regards,

Mike

On 20 January 2011 07:56, Geoffrey De Smet <ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> Op 19-01-11 22:33, Michael Anstis schreef:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I tried building a WAR for Guvnor and found a couple of hick-ups
> > (although it was with my local copy of master taken a few months ago).
> >
> > I mention them here in case they are unknown issues (feel free to beat
> > me up if I simply need to resync with master; which will happen as
> > part of my dtable commit...)
> >
> > 1) In \drools-guvnor
> >
> > mvn package -DskipTests=true -PfullProfile
> >
> > Didn't build dependant drools-ide-common, as I'd expect and I had to
> > "mvn install" this first.
> This is partially normal...
> mvn install = mvn package (=make the jar) + copy the jar in the local
> repository
> mvn package = mvn compile + ... + make the jar
>
> But for normal java apps, mvn compile is enough even in a multi-module,
> because it doesn't need to create a jar (or copy that in the local repo)
> as it justs reuses drools-ide-common/target/classes in the classpath of
> drools-guvnor.
> Just like your Eclipse/IntelliJ does (because if were to build a jar
> each time it would take as long as the maven build).
> However, that might not work for GWT compilation,
> so the safest bet it to do mvn install...
> >
> > 2) In \drools-guvnor
> >
> > mvn package -DskipTests=true -PfullProfile
> >
> > Built the WAR however the test classes are also included, leading to a
> > Seam error when deploying:-
> >
> > SEVERE: Exception sending context initialized event to listener
> > instance of class org.jboss.seam.servlet.SeamListener
> > java.lang.IllegalStateException: Two components with the same name and
> > precedence - component name:
> > org.drools.guvnor.server.security.RoleBasedPermissionStore, component
> > classes:
> > org.drools.guvnor.server.security.MockRoleBasedPermissionStore,
> > org.drools.guvnor.server.security.RoleBasedPermissionStore
> >     at
> >
> org.jboss.seam.init.Initialization.addComponentDescriptor(Initialization.java:586)
> >     at
> >
> org.jboss.seam.init.Initialization.installScannedComponentAndRoles(Initialization.java:927)
> >     at
> >
> org.jboss.seam.init.Initialization.scanForComponents(Initialization.java:874)
> >     at org.jboss.seam.init.Initialization.init(Initialization.java:687)
> >
> > This traced back to "MockRoleBasedPermissionStore" in the test classes
> > and "RoleBasedPermissionStore" in the non-test classes.
> >
> > Tomcat 6.x.
>
> Does it occur in hosted mode in Eclipse/IntelliJ?
> Looks like the test classes are also copied into the war?!?
> Tihomir might know more about the whole role based stuff.
> >
> > 3) Alot of Guvnor tests failed, however I assume Toni Rikkola could
> > have fixed recently with his work in this area.
>
> If they talk about a repository lock failing, it's cool and Toni's
> working on it.
> If it's something else, it's not cool.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-dev mailing list
> > rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
> --
> With kind regards,
> Geoffrey De Smet
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20110120/2e4836fb/attachment.html