[rules-dev] Guvnor build problems? -> Tomcat
Michael Anstis
michael.anstis at gmail.com
Thu Jan 20 11:13:00 EST 2011
Ge0ffrey,
Packaging is now fine :-)
I had problems running Guvnor's WAR under the Tomcat instance installed
through Synaptic on Ubuntu 10, but had no issues with a vanilla Tomcat
6.0.30 downloaded and installed from Apache :-)
I'll comment the JIRA but suspect issues with some Tomcat6 installation is
more a configuration related than Guvnor.
With kind regards,
Mike
On 20 January 2011 13:20, Geoffrey De Smet <ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com> wrote:
> Michael,
>
> I've done a "mvn clean install" locally and that test class
> (MockRoleBasedPermissionStore) is not packaged in the war.
> This directory
> droolsjbpm/drools-guvnor/*target*
> /drools-guvnor/WEB-INF/classes/org/drools/guvnor/server/security
> does not contain MockRoleBasedPermissionStore (which is normal, as it's
> comes from src/test/java, not src/main/java).
>
> So I don't understand how it ended up in your war you created and deployed
> to tomcat.
> Can you check if you do a "mvn clean install -DskipTests" that you have it
> again?
>
>
> I do have problems to deploy the Guvnor SNAPSHOT on tomcat 6:
>
> ERROR 20-01 14:05:09,218 (RepositoryImpl.java:getWorkspaceInfo:785)
> Unable to initialize workspace 'security'
> javax.jcr.RepositoryException: Cannot instantiate persistence manager
> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.persistence.pool.DerbyPersistenceManager
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.RepositoryImpl.createPersistenceManager(RepositoryImpl.java:1433)
> ...
> Caused by: org.apache.commons.dbcp.SQLNestedException: Cannot create
> PoolableConnectionFactory (Failed to create database
> 'repository/workspaces/security/db', see the next exception for details.)
> at
> org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSource.createDataSource(BasicDataSource.java:1225)
> ...
> Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: Failed to create database
> 'repository/workspaces/security/db', see the next exception for details.
> at
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.SQLExceptionFactory40.getSQLException(Unknown
> Source)
> ...
> Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: Directory /home/gdesmet/opt/appserver/*apache-tomcat-6.0.30/bin/repository/workspaces/security/db
> already exists*.
> at
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.SQLExceptionFactory.getSQLException(Unknown
> Source)
> ...
> Caused by: ERROR XBM0J: Directory
> /home/gdesmet/opt/appserver/apache-tomcat-6.0.30/bin/repository/workspaces/security/db
> already exists.
> at org.apache.derby.iapi.error.StandardException.newException(Unknown
> Source)
>
>
> Op 20-01-11 10:15, Geoffrey De Smet schreef:
>
> I don't know who broke it, but I 'll see if I can get it fixed
>
> Op 20-01-11 09:20, Michael Anstis schreef:
>
> Hi Ge0ffrey,
>
>
> Does it occur in hosted mode in Eclipse/IntelliJ?
> Looks like the test classes are also copied into the war?!?
> Tihomir might know more about the whole role based stuff.
>
> - It occurs when deploying to Tomcat (any Servlet Container?).
> - The WAR *does* contain all "test" classes\resources.
> - It does not occur in hosted mode (as I can remove "test"
> classes\resources from the classpath).
> - Seam is correct in reporting the error (as two classes are declared
> as being the same component, because of the inclusion of "test" classes).
>
> So I'd surmise a compile problem with maven (but it could be old news)?
>
> With kind regards,
>
> Mike
>
> On 20 January 2011 07:56, Geoffrey De Smet <ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com <mailto:ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com> <ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> Op 19-01-11 22:33, Michael Anstis schreef:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I tried building a WAR for Guvnor and found a couple of hick-ups
> > (although it was with my local copy of master taken a few months
> ago).
> >
> > I mention them here in case they are unknown issues (feel free
> to beat
> > me up if I simply need to resync with master; which will happen as
> > part of my dtable commit...)
> >
> > 1) In \drools-guvnor
> >
> > mvn package -DskipTests=true -PfullProfile
> >
> > Didn't build dependant drools-ide-common, as I'd expect and I had to
> > "mvn install" this first.
> This is partially normal...
> mvn install = mvn package (=make the jar) + copy the jar in the local
> repository
> mvn package = mvn compile + ... + make the jar
>
> But for normal java apps, mvn compile is enough even in a
> multi-module,
> because it doesn't need to create a jar (or copy that in the local
> repo)
> as it justs reuses drools-ide-common/target/classes in the
> classpath of
> drools-guvnor.
> Just like your Eclipse/IntelliJ does (because if were to build a jar
> each time it would take as long as the maven build).
> However, that might not work for GWT compilation,
> so the safest bet it to do mvn install...
> >
> > 2) In \drools-guvnor
> >
> > mvn package -DskipTests=true -PfullProfile
> >
> > Built the WAR however the test classes are also included,
> leading to a
> > Seam error when deploying:-
> >
> > SEVERE: Exception sending context initialized event to listener
> > instance of class org.jboss.seam.servlet.SeamListener
> > java.lang.IllegalStateException: Two components with the same
> name and
> > precedence - component name:
> > org.drools.guvnor.server.security.RoleBasedPermissionStore,
> component
> > classes:
> > org.drools.guvnor.server.security.MockRoleBasedPermissionStore,
> > org.drools.guvnor.server.security.RoleBasedPermissionStore
> > at
> >
> org.jboss.seam.init.Initialization.addComponentDescriptor(Initialization.java:586)
> > at
> >
> org.jboss.seam.init.Initialization.installScannedComponentAndRoles(Initialization.java:927)
> > at
> >
> org.jboss.seam.init.Initialization.scanForComponents(Initialization.java:874)
> > at
> org.jboss.seam.init.Initialization.init(Initialization.java:687)
> >
> > This traced back to "MockRoleBasedPermissionStore" in the test
> classes
> > and "RoleBasedPermissionStore" in the non-test classes.
> >
> > Tomcat 6.x.
>
> Does it occur in hosted mode in Eclipse/IntelliJ?
> Looks like the test classes are also copied into the war?!?
> Tihomir might know more about the whole role based stuff.
> >
> > 3) Alot of Guvnor tests failed, however I assume Toni Rikkola could
> > have fixed recently with his work in this area.
>
> If they talk about a repository lock failing, it's cool and Toni's
> working on it.
> If it's something else, it's not cool.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-dev mailing list
> > rules-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev at lists.jboss.org> <rules-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
> --
> With kind regards,
> Geoffrey De Smet
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev at lists.jboss.org> <rules-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing listrules-dev at lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
> --
> With kind regards,
> Geoffrey De Smet
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20110120/213ce596/attachment.html
More information about the rules-dev
mailing list