[rules-dev] JBRULES-2932: suspicious syntax might be the cause?

[Laird Nelson]

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun at gmail.com>wrote:

> This is correct syntax, although the parens are redundant in this
> particular situation.
>
> Technically, this is called a "multi-restriction". Expand it by inserting
> the field (answer.ID) in front of each relational operator. It's inherited
> from COBOL :-)
>

OK, so then this issue is a valid bug?  Thanks for your help.

L
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20110325/3fd870a1/attachment.html