[rules-dev] BUG: [5.3.0.Final] CollectSetAccumulateFunction should probably use IdentityHashMap internally

Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.laun at gmail.com
Thu Mar 1 01:39:57 EST 2012


Given time, I can concoct a test case where the percentage of equals
varies between 0 and 100%. But whatever these results might be, I
think that the findings up to now indicate that collectSet should be left
as it is, and any desire for a different behaviour should be satisfied
by a separate accumulate function, say, collectBag, returning the
key set of an IdentityHashMap. (Clarifying the reasons of the implementation
differences might be interesting.)

-W

On 1 March 2012 00:11, SirMungus <Patrick_Rusk at ssga.com> wrote:

>
> SirMungus wrote
> >
> > So, there would undoubtedly be a performance impact, even not taking into
> > account the "new HashSet()" in the getResults() call. Whether it would be
> > significant enough in real world scenarios to warrant a much more complex
> > implementation requires more knowledge of Drools's user base than I
> > possess, for sure. My guess is that Wolfgang's second scenario above is
> > generally unrealistic. But, if it is routine for rules with collectSet()
> > to end up with sets involving thousands of objects like the /second/
> > scenario, that could certainly be an issue.
> >
> Goodness. I meant to say that the first scenario (instead of "second"
> italicized above) could potentially be realistic. The larger the sets,
> larger the penalty each time getResults() is called.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/BUG-5-3-0-Final-CollectSetAccumulateFunction-should-probably-use-IdentityHashMap-internally-tp3774079p3788970.html
> Sent from the Drools: Developer (committer) mailing list mailing list
> archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20120301/2671c64f/attachment.html 


More information about the rules-dev mailing list