[rules-dev] IMPORTANT: big commit incoming
Edson Tirelli
ed.tirelli at gmail.com
Mon Mar 19 13:41:40 EDT 2012
From a serialization perspective, very simple as everything that is
being serialized now takes into account this possibility of partial
serialization. I guess the "hard" part will be jbpm just figuring out that
needs to be serialized or not (basically dependency management between the
components). I am working on the serialization part now, and we can discuss
tomorrow how you guys can take advantage of that.
Edson
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Mauricio Salatino <salaboy at gmail.com>wrote:
> I like that "the possibility of partial serialization for jBPM"!
> How hard it will be to implement that?
>
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Edson Tirelli <ed.tirelli at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> We are adopting a serialization framework (Google's Protobuf) in order
>> to properly support backward compatibility with binary serialized sessions.
>> Our existing serialization framework was/is good for when we implement
>> session replication/HA, but was very complicated for long term, disk
>> persistency and backward compatibility.
>>
>> We will now have a documented serialization format, as well as the
>> possibility of partial serialization for jBPM, and security features like
>> signing sessions with public/private keys to prevent attacks in a non-safe
>> environment.
>>
>> Edson
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Esteban Aliverti <
>> esteban.aliverti at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Just for curiosity, what is the new serialization protocol?
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>>
>>> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>>>
>>> Esteban Aliverti
>>> - Developer @ http://www.plugtree.com
>>> - Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Edson Tirelli <ed.tirelli at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> All, I am about to do a big commit into the master branch (as in
>>>> roughly 98 changed files with 35,731 additions and 1,795 deletions. ).
>>>> This is the implementation for the new serialization protocol. I will do
>>>> that in 1 hour from now... if anyone needs me to wait, please speak now or
>>>> never... :)
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Edson
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Edson Tirelli
>>>> JBoss Drools Core Development
>>>> JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Edson Tirelli
>> JBoss Drools Core Development
>> JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> - MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com
> - Co-Founder @ http://www.jugargentina.org
> - Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar
>
> - Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
--
Edson Tirelli
JBoss Drools Core Development
JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20120319/74553582/attachment-0001.html
More information about the rules-dev
mailing list