[rules-dev] cr1

Mario Fusco mario.fusco at gmail.com
Mon Oct 15 05:37:12 EDT 2012


I'll give a look at the Spring issue.

Mario

On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Michael Anstis
<michael.anstis at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I will make the 5.5.x branch today.
>
> These are the current issues....
> *
> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/droolsjbpm-integration/*
>
> Failing tests:
> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/droolsjbpm-integration/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/
>
>    - SpringDroolsTest.testConfiguration
>
>
> *http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/guvnor/*
>
> Failing tests:
> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/guvnor/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/
>
>    - ServiceImplementationIntegrationTest.testListUserPermissionsPagedResults
>    (jliu, could you please take a look?)
>    - PackageAssemblerIntegrationTest.testFunctionWithFactType (Rikkola,
>    is this as a result of the change I think you were making around Functions
>    you were doing for Mario?)
>    - AssetPackageResourceIntegrationTest.testUpdateAssetFromAtom
>    (RESTEasy issue, do we want to @Ignore on the 5.5.x branch?)
>    - AssetPackageResourceIntegrationTest.testCreateAssetFromAtom
>    (RESTEasy issue, do we want to @Ignore on the 5.5.x branch?)
>    - BasicPackageResourceIntegrationTest.testCreateAndUpdateAndDeletePackageFromAtom
>    (RESTEasy issue, do we want to @Ignore on the 5.5.x branch?)
>    - CategoryResourceIntegrationTest.testGetAssetsCreatedByAtomByCategoryAsAtom
>    (RESTEasy issue, do we want to @Ignore on the 5.5.x branch?)
>
>
> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/droolsjbpm-build-distribution/
>
> Failing tests:
> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/droolsjbpm-build-distribution/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/
>
>    - BPMN2OsgiTest.testMinimalProcess
>    - SimpleOsgiTest.testOsgiPlatformStarts
>    - SimpleOsgiTest.testOsgiEnvironment
>    - SimpleOsgiTest.testCompiler
>    - SimpleOsgiTest.testDecisionTable
>
> Who is going to volunteer to look into the Spring and OSGi failing tests?
> ;)
>
> For those who may not already be aware, due to a RESTEasy issue (
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RESTEASY-782) the Atom REST API in Guvnor
> only works with AS7.0.1.
>
> Any pressure that can be applied to get the RESTEasy team to fix this
> would be welcome as it is required for jBPM Designer to work with Guvnor on
> AS7.1.x.
>
> With kind regards,
>
> Mike
>
>
> On 13 October 2012 17:12, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org> wrote:
>
>> We should try and wrap up CR1 this week. This release will never be
>> productised, so quicker we can switch to 6.0 the better. We have a month to
>> produce a stable "runtime" core, 6.0-alpha1, where we promise binary
>> compatibility to other groups in SOA.
>>
>> I'll send an email explaining 6.0-alpha1 for monday.
>>
>> Mark
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20121015/ef20c750/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the rules-dev mailing list