[rules-dev] services registered by OSGi bundle activators of Kie, Drools and Jbpm are still needed ?

[Mark Proctor]

I think things have evolved organically here. We probably need to do a full review, to ensure consistency.

I suspect know one would know the answers, without having to dig in the code first.

Mark

On 15 Aug 2014, at 16:02, Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> has a long time that I don't play with Drools and JBPM source code. This 
> week I was walking through them again and saw a lot of new elements, 
> interfaces and new ways to setup things.
> 
> I saw that some Blueprint specific annotations and classes were created 
> (kie-aries-blueprint).
> But the existent osgi activators are still registering some services 
> that seems not be appropriated anymore. at least they are different from 
> the set of elements in blueprint namespace (environment, kmodule, kbase 
> and others ) that I saw.
> 
> For example, in activator of drools-core we have a 
> KnowledgeBaseFactoryServiceImpl being registered. in drools-compiler we 
> have KnowledgeBuilderFactoryServiceImpl being registered.
> 
> I can't use blueprint, so I need to figure out what is the best setup 
> workflow for OSGi and get the proper services registered.
> 
> Question, is the kie-aries-blueprint.xsd reflecting the actual state of 
> kie, drools and jbpm core setup workflow, so I can use it as start point?
> 
> could someone check that and give me a feedback ?
> 
> many thanks,
> 
> Cristiano
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev