From ssamarug at gmail.com Thu Jun 29 06:24:49 2017 From: ssamarug at gmail.com (Sebastian Samaruga) Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 07:24:49 -0300 Subject: [rules-dev] Beginner Question: Semantic Web Features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, I'm new to this group and relatively new to JBoss Drools. I'm really interested in collaboration on new features. For what I've been working on last time it seems like other technologies I've been seen could be really a good fit for, for example, rule engines. Those technologies are those of Semantic Web. It seems sad to me they have been not leveraged for this kind of endeavors. I think they could be a good metamodel, for example, for graph databases or algorithms. I'm attaching a document with my two cents regarding SW. Despite being 'semantic', my view is not as 'extremist' or 'purist' as those of other SW guys. I'm trying to give it a tweak for building 'executable metamodels'. I hope not being misplacing this message. Sorry if this is an off topic. Regards, Sebasti?n. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20170629/18bdbfbc/attachment-0001.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Business.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 160521 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20170629/18bdbfbc/attachment-0001.pdf From wolfgang.laun at gmail.com Thu Jun 29 10:05:57 2017 From: wolfgang.laun at gmail.com (Wolfgang Laun) Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:05:57 +0200 Subject: [rules-dev] Beginner Question: Semantic Web Features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: The list you have addressed is obsolete. You might try drools-usage@ googlegroups.com instead, but I guess this is beyond the usual level that's being discussed there. But I'm not listening to this address any more, so I may not be a reliable source. Good luck -W On 29 June 2017 at 12:24, Sebastian Samaruga wrote: > Hi, I'm new to this group and relatively new to JBoss Drools. I'm really > interested in collaboration on new features. > > For what I've been working on last time it seems like other technologies > I've been seen could be really a good fit for, for example, rule engines. > > Those technologies are those of Semantic Web. It seems sad to me they have > been not leveraged for this kind of endeavors. > > I think they could be a good metamodel, for example, for graph databases > or algorithms. > > I'm attaching a document with my two cents regarding SW. Despite being > 'semantic', my view is not as 'extremist' or 'purist' as those of other SW > guys. I'm trying to give it a tweak for building 'executable metamodels'. > > I hope not being misplacing this message. Sorry if this is an off topic. > Regards, > > Sebasti?n. > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20170629/b7b75357/attachment.html