<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Was fine for the initially implementaiton, woudl rather have it fully
integrated for 4.0 final.<br>
<br>
Mark<br>
Michael Neale wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:96ab3ced0705241630s741eb4a3ta8d8e2d90c717d8e@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">great, not sure if I will do this for 4.0 though, will
see, but certainly this sounds like it can work nicely. <br>
<br>
Keeping it decoupled as it was is/was probably the best thing,
definitely the right way to go. <br>
<br>
So it ruleflow still "experimental" class for 4.0? or is it now
officially part of the core? <br>
<br>
Michael<br>
<br>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 5/22/07, <b
class="gmail_sendername">Kris Verlaenen</b> <<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:kris.verlaenen@gmail.com">
kris.verlaenen@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">The
reason it was specified in a separate class is that it is still
<br>
more experimental, and I didn't want to interfere with the core stuff<br>
too much. I don't see any real downsides, ruleflows are indeed just<br>
another asset I think.<br>
<br>
Kris<br>
<br>
On 5/22/07, Michael Neale <
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:michael.neale@gmail.com">michael.neale@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
> Kris, looking at the ruleflow stuff (not the core, but the .rf
stuff), I<br>
> have a suggestion on how to make it more integrated with the
ruleset/package
<br>
> structure.<br>
><br>
> At the moment Ruleflow packages are a seperate entity that is
merged into a<br>
> RuleBase as needed.<br>
><br>
> Does anyone have any objections if we add the ability to have
ruleflow as
<br>
> part of a rule Package itself? (thus when that package is added to
the<br>
> rulebase, all the processes for ruleflow go along with it)? so a
ruleflow.rf<br>
> file for example becomes just another asset like a drl?
<br>
><br>
> Kris? thoughts? downsides?<br>
> No need to change the current API.<br>
><br>
> Michael<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>