<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
My company made a (quite detailed) benchmark of a few business rules languages (~20), including criteria such as expressiveness, user-friendliness for business and IT people, formal quality and other aspects such as tools support.<br><br>We did not include the particular SBVR compliance as it was not finalized at that time, but If you're interested I could send it tomorrow.<br><br>B.<br><br><blockquote><hr>Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:34:14 +0200<br>From: mmquelo@gmail.com<br>To: rules-dev@lists.jboss.org<br>Subject: [rules-dev] Rule Engine Benchmarking...<br><br><div> </div>
<div>Hi there!</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I was wondering whether there exists a complete benchmark on Drools Rule Engine or not.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Is there any new public benchmark comparing Drools to another Rule Engine?</div>
<div> </div>
<div>In case I should do it by myself, what set of parametes should I consider in order</div>
<div>to benchmark a Business rule engine?... I mean the minumum set.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I spent a couple of weeks reading stuff on BRMS and I think the main parameters are:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>SBVR compliance, JSR 94 Compliance, RETE compliance, Inference performance, usability...</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Could You suggest me anything else?</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Thank you very much.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Kind regards.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Massimiliano</div>
</blockquote><br /><hr />Arrêtez le ping pong, et recevez votre réponse dans la seconde ! <a href='http://messenger.live.com' target='_new'>Windows Live Messenger</a></body>
</html>