Hi Geoffrey,<br><br>Being relatively new I can't comment on some of the specifics, but I question the following:-<br><ul><li>drools-assistant</li><li>drools-atom</li><li>drools-clips (I believe Mark did this on a rainy weekend, but don't know if it's still supported).</li>
<li>drools-container</li><li>drools-doc\drools-docs (which is actively used?!? Do we need both?)</li><li>drools-rhq-plugin</li><li>drools-simulator</li><li>install</li><li>src</li></ul>I have thought for a long time I'd be good to have on the Wiki a summary of what each project represents and what package (JAR) they bundle into.<br>
<br>Cheers,<br><br>Mike<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 26 October 2010 15:59, Geoffrey De Smet <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ge0ffrey.spam@gmail.com">ge0ffrey.spam@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
I am looking at cleaning up the build and moving to maven 3, to make it<br>
faster, more reliable, etc.<br>
I am also actively wondering if some modules or files aren't dead code.<br>
First candidate is drools-atom:<br>
<br>
The module drools-atom is in limbo:<br>
- It still exists<br>
- It's not part of any build<br>
- Does it still build? No<br>
-- 'dependencies.dependency.version' is missing for<br>
org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-frontend-jaxrs:jar<br>
- Does it still compile against the latest drools version? Idunno, but<br>
since it's not part of the build, tomorrow's refactor might break it.<br>
- Does anyone use it? If it doesn't build and it isn't released... no?<br>
<br>
I don't think that code is useful to anyone in this state. I do think<br>
it's presence alone slightly complicates the drools sources.<br>
<br>
<br>
What do we do with it?<br>
- [A] remove the directory drools-atom from trunk (it's still retired in<br>
in subversion)<br>
- [B] leave it like it is now. It might be usefull to someone<br>
- [C] add it to the build again, make it work<br>
- [D] create a separate repository "drools-incubator" and move it there<br>
<br>
In my opinion:<br>
+1 for [A]<br>
-1 for [B]: either it builds or it's not in trunk<br>
<br>
<br>
If we all agree that removing dead modules is a good idea, I 'll provide<br>
a list of possible candidates next time.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
With kind regards,<br>
Geoffrey De Smet<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
rules-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org">rules-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev</a><br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>