<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
On 19/08/2011 16:45, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:CANaj1LcQSYnpqE80nPq-rOtNsTN6qDW-ZtwMFbu80iGxYh99sw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">I'll not create any JIRAs for problems that come and
go with the presence and absence of dialect "mvel".<br>
<br>
After one of those, Mark has urged me to create another JIRA for
MVEL, and this I just won't do. For me, as a <i>Drools </i>user,
this project <i>Drools </i>has adopted MVEL as a vehicle for
primary expression and statement evaluation; since 5.2.0 it seems
that I don't have a choice for some parts of the Drools language.
For me, this means that the full responsibility now rests with the
Drools team - I cannot simply work around by sticking with
'dialect "java"'.<br>
<br>
Sorry if this sounds harsh and egocentric, but what I've heard
about MVEL maintainer's non-eagerness for fixing bugs hasn't
inspired me to do otherwise. (Since this is hearsay, I should add
the politically correct statement: "innocent until proven
otherwise".)<br>
</blockquote>
Mike just won't explore bugs, without unit tests. Once a unit test
is in place he's responsive in fixing it. Which is fair enough.<br>
<br>
Mark<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CANaj1LcQSYnpqE80nPq-rOtNsTN6qDW-ZtwMFbu80iGxYh99sw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<br>
Regards<br>
Wolfgang<br>
<br>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org">rules-dev@lists.jboss.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>