I think you misunderstood the intent of the proposal. It's not that I propose<div>a reusable CE element combination which might indeed be a query. I proposed</div><div>a parameterized sequence of lexical tokens, aka macro. I trust that you know</div>
<div>C and the C preprocessor: I want a macro, not a function.</div><div><br></div><div>-W</div><div><br></div><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 27 March 2012 19:07, Mark Proctor <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org">mproctor@codehaus.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">query can somewhat help for re-usable elements, as per "Add CE<br>
templates". You can wrap elements in a query and use that inside a<br>
rule, remember our queries are reactive if you leave off the ?.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
Mark<br>
</font></span><div class="im HOEnZb"><br>
On 27/03/2012 10:02, Wolfgang Laun wrote:<br>
> I've collected a few things I've been moaning about... They are<br>
> intended to make DRL programming more convenient, given the current<br>
> set of the Engine's capabilities, i.e., enhance Drools' usability!<br>
><br>
> AFAIK, none of these proposals would break backward compatibility.<br>
><br>
</div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">> Cheers<br>
> Wolfgang<br>
><br>
><br>
> On 27/03/2012, Mark Proctor<<a href="mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org">mproctor@codehaus.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>> I've put up a wiki page to collect thoughts on ideas that would involve<br>
>> breaking backwards compatability in Drools. It's aimed to produce ideas<br>
>> for Drools 6.0.<br>
>><br>
>> No suggestion is too silly, think of it as a brainstorming area for<br>
>> alternative syntaxes and behaviours to what we have now, so knock<br>
>> yourself out.<br>
>> <a href="https://community.jboss.org/wiki/BreakingChangesSuggestions" target="_blank">https://community.jboss.org/wiki/BreakingChangesSuggestions</a><br>
>><br>
>> Mark<br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> rules-dev mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org">rules-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
>> <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev</a><br>
>><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> rules-dev mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org">rules-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
rules-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org">rules-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>