Hi,<br><br>I will make the 5.5.x branch today.<br><br>These are the current issues....<br><b><br><a href="http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/droolsjbpm-integration/" target="_blank">http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/droolsjbpm-integration/</a></b><br>
<br>Failing tests: <a href="http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/droolsjbpm-integration/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/" target="_blank">http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/droolsjbpm-integration/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/</a><br>
<ul>
<li>SpringDroolsTest.testConfiguration</li></ul><span style="font-weight:bold"><br></span><b><a href="http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/guvnor/" target="_blank">http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/guvnor/</a></b><br>
<br>Failing tests: <a href="http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/guvnor/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/" target="_blank">http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/guvnor/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/</a><span style="font-weight:bold"><br>
</span><ul><li>ServiceImplementationIntegrationTest.testListUserPermissionsPagedResults (jliu, could you please take a look?)</li><li>PackageAssemblerIntegrationTest.testFunctionWithFactType (Rikkola, is this as a result of the change I think you were making around Functions you were doing for Mario?)</li>
<li>AssetPackageResourceIntegrationTest.testUpdateAssetFromAtom (RESTEasy issue, do we want to @Ignore on the 5.5.x branch?)</li><li>AssetPackageResourceIntegrationTest.testCreateAssetFromAtom (RESTEasy issue, do we want to @Ignore on the 5.5.x branch?)</li>
<li>BasicPackageResourceIntegrationTest.testCreateAndUpdateAndDeletePackageFromAtom (RESTEasy issue, do we want to @Ignore on the 5.5.x branch?)</li><li>CategoryResourceIntegrationTest.testGetAssetsCreatedByAtomByCategoryAsAtom (RESTEasy issue, do we want to @Ignore on the 5.5.x branch?)</li>
</ul><span style="font-weight:bold"><br><a href="http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/droolsjbpm-build-distribution/" target="_blank">http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/droolsjbpm-build-distribution/</a><br></span><br>
Failing tests: <a href="http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/droolsjbpm-build-distribution/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/" target="_blank">http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/droolsjbpm-build-distribution/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/</a><br>
<ul><li>BPMN2OsgiTest.testMinimalProcess</li><li>SimpleOsgiTest.testOsgiPlatformStarts</li><li>SimpleOsgiTest.testOsgiEnvironment</li><li>SimpleOsgiTest.testCompiler</li><li>SimpleOsgiTest.testDecisionTable</li></ul>Who is going to volunteer to look into the Spring and OSGi failing tests? ;)<br>
<br>
For those who may not already be aware, due to a RESTEasy issue (<a href="https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RESTEASY-782" target="_blank">https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RESTEASY-782</a>) the Atom REST API in Guvnor only works with AS7.0.1.<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold"><br></span>Any pressure that can be applied to get the RESTEasy team to fix this would be welcome as it is required for jBPM Designer to work with Guvnor on AS7.1.x.<br><span style="font-weight:bold"><br>
</span>With kind regards,<br><br>Mike<br><span style="font-weight:bold"><br></span><div class="gmail_quote">On 13 October 2012 17:12, Mark Proctor <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org" target="_blank">mproctor@codehaus.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">We should try and wrap up CR1 this week. This release will never be productised, so quicker we can switch to 6.0 the better. We have a month to produce a stable "runtime" core, 6.0-alpha1, where we promise binary compatibility to other groups in SOA.<br>
<br>
I'll send an email explaining 6.0-alpha1 for monday.<br>
<span><font color="#888888"><br>
Mark</font></span></blockquote></div><br>