<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=iso-8859-1"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">+1 for IWB <div><br><div><div>On Apr 10, 2013, at 3:19 PM, Mark Proctor <<a href="mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org">mproctor@codehaus.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=iso-8859-1"><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Did we decided on an extension, instead of IDE?<div><br></div><div>Mark<br><div><div>On 10 Apr 2013, at 17:11, Michael Anstis <<a href="mailto:michael.anstis@gmail.com">michael.anstis@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr">I will be starting the split tomorrow.<br><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 2 April 2013 11:23, Mark Proctor <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org" target="_blank">mproctor@codehaus.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">studio might be a problem, like suite and platform, it might overlap with something they prefer in the RHT product names.<br>
<br>
We could have "workbench" instead of "work". That would still be under IWE. Integrated Workbench Environment. Or we could drop the Enviornement and have IWB - Integrated WorkBench.<br>
<br>
Mostly I want to make sure we don't chose something that skewer people's thinking that it's only suitable for a specific use case, hence my search for a more generic term. Also that we find a suitably short acronym. This framework can form the basis of a variety of use cases.<br>
<br>
IDE - Integrated Development Environment<br>
IWE - Integrated WorkBench Environment.<br>
IWB - Integrated WorkBench<br>
AWD - Advanced WorkBench<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
Mark<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
On 2 Apr 2013, at 10:05, Wolfgang Laun <<a href="mailto:wolfgang.laun@gmail.com">wolfgang.laun@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> On 02/04/2013, Michael Anstis <<a href="mailto:michael.anstis@gmail.com">michael.anstis@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> I'm easy with "W" instead of "D". How about "Integrated Work Studio"<br>
>> instead of "Environment"?<br>
>><br>
><br>
> Seems to me that people have forgotten about the good old work bench.<br>
> Too nutsy-and-boltsy for the brighter future?<br>
><br>
> -W<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> rules-dev mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org">rules-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev</a><br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
rules-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org">rules-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
_______________________________________________<br>rules-dev mailing list<br><a href="mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org">rules-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br><a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev</a></blockquote></div><br></div></div>_______________________________________________<br>rules-dev mailing list<br><a href="mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org">rules-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev</blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>