[rules-users] RE: [rules-dev] Rule-Flow in Rules 4.0 M2 and ruleFlowGroups

[Mark Proctor]

RuleFlow cannot fire rules, it can only place rules onto the agenda to 
be fired and track those rules. So I believe that was the existing 
behaviour.

Mark
Anstis, Michael (M.) wrote:
> Using the trunk I can't get any ruleflow to run without also calling fireAllRules().
>
> I have this nagging doubt that this is different to how it used to work but a short time ago.
>
> Am I going mad?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anstis, Michael (M.) 
> Sent: 14 May 2007 12:27
> To: 'Rules Dev List'
> Cc: 'Rules Users List'
> Subject: RE: [rules-dev] Rule-Flow in Rules 4.0 M2 and ruleFlowGroups
>
> Have you set the RuleFlowId of the Rule Flow you're designing?
>
> Click on the white background and change the RuleFlowId in the properties view. 
>
> This is the Id of the RuleFlow to invoke with startProcess(<RuleFlowId>).
>
> Any rules with "ruleflow-group" attribute set to match those in your RuleFlow will execute.
>
> Any rules without a "ruleflow-group" attribute set will execute on FireAllRules().
>
> I hope this solves your problem.
>
> CC'ed to Users Group for information.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rules-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Mahler, Bjoern (EXTERN: LINEAS)
> Sent: 14 May 2007 12:18
> To: rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Subject: [rules-dev] Rule-Flow in Rules 4.0 M2 and ruleFlowGroups
>
> Hello...
>
> I don't know whether it's a bug or something else... - i'm currently
> evaluating the new version m2 and especially the rule-flow feature, which
> would be the yet missing part for us to use drools. 
>
> So after creating a testflow.rf with your editor i've put the created
> .rfm-file in the context as sugested on the blog/release-notes:
> processBuilder.addProcessFromFile(new
> InputStreamReader(DroolsTest.class.getResourceAsStream( "/testflow.rfm" ) )
> );
>
> After invoking the rules with workingMemory.startProcess("test"); and/or
> workingMemory.fireAllRules(); nothing happened... A look in the sources and
> the rfm-xml-file shows, that the element <ruleFlowGroup> is empty! I would
> have expected the name of the group at this point... After changing this to
> the desired string, the behaviour looks more expecting ;)
>
> The problem is, that the .rfm file is regenerated after editing the rf-file
> so changes to that will be lost...
>
> Is it a bug or did i something wrong?
>
> TIA
> Björn
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>