[rules-users] Using multiple RuleFlows with similar group names

[james_d]

Hi,

I've built a RuleBase comprised of 2 ruleflows and their respective rules. 
Each ruleflow is defined in a separate package however both use a common set
of ruleflow-group names.  It looks something like this:

Ruleflows: Flow 1, Flow 2

Flow 1 package: com.test.flow1
Flow 1 ruleflow groups: Group A, Group B, Group C

Flow 2 package: com.test.flow2
Flow 2 ruleflow groups: Group A, Group B, Group C

When I load both packages into a RuleBase and insert an Object, I see that
rules in both Flow 1 and Flow 2 are executed, even though only ruleflow
process "Flow 1" was started.  In short, it appears that Drools does not
take a rule's package into consideration when executing a ruleflow.  Is this
expected behavior?  
My understanding was that the rules in Flow 2 should not be executed because
they are in a different package.

I welcome any input.


-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Using-multiple-RuleFlows-with-similar-group-names-tf4754955.html#a13597354
Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.