[rules-users] Hibernate

[Mark Proctor]

yay, glad to see the documentation was useful for someone :)

Mark
Heyns, Juan wrote:
> Thanks for this. We will probably exclude the PersistentCollection
>
> 	RuleBaseConfiguration conf = new RuleBaseConfiguration();
>
> conf.setShadowProxyExcludes("org.hibernate.collection.PersistentCollecti
> on");
>
> 	RuleBase ruleBase = RuleBaseFactory.newRuleBase(conf);
>
> to fix our problem, luckily we treat these collections as immutable
> already.
>
> Juan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org
> [mailto:rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Peter Mikula
> Sent: 01 October 2007 10:37 AM
> To: Rules Users List
> Cc: juan.heyns at epiuse.com
> Subject: Re: [rules-users] Hibernate
>
> Heyns, Juan wrote:
>   
>> Thanks for the reply... I will give this a go. Has ShadowProxyUtils
>>     
> been
>   
>> introduced in 4.0.1, I didn't get this behavior in 4.0...
>>     
>
>   I was getting the exception for both versions, it happened always when
>   I have iterated over the collection in the "then" part.
>
>   
>> It is quite imperative that I get this working, since our project
>> depends on Hibernate and Drools. Should we create a JIRA for this?
>>     
>
>   Beware that you should treat the persistent collections as immutable
>   if you want to use the submitted patch.
>
> PS: checking the manual again I have discovered that there were
>   already done some improvements. You can control shadow proxying with
>
>      drools.shadowProxy = false
>
>      drools.shadowproxy.exclude = org.domainy.* org.domainx.ClassZ
>
>   so there is not much use for that patch.
>
> --
>   pm
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
> "Employees of Lonmin Platinum ("Lonplats") are not authorised to conclude
> electronic transactions or to enter into electronic agreements on behalf
> of Lonplats. Any electronic signature (other than an advanced electronic
> signature as defined in the Electronic Communications and Transactions
> Act of 2003) added to a data message (such as an email or an attachment
> to an (email) ostensibly on behalf of Lonplats by a Lonplats employee shall
> not be legally binding on Lonplats and Lonplats shall incur no liability of
> any nature whatsoever, directly or indirectly, arising from such act on the
> part of it's employee. It is further recorded that nothing (other than an
> advanced electronic signature) inserted into any data message
> emanating from Lonplats shall be construed as constituting an electronic
> signature"
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20071001/0c913aba/attachment.html