[rules-users] Ruleflow groups in decision tables

[Mark Proctor]

Knapp, Barry wrote:
> That generic attribute would sure be a nice place to put effective and
> expiration dates.
> Really looking forward to the patch :)
>   
This won't get done any time soon as we are about to design a new 
approach to decision tables. So if people want this done as part of the 
4.0.3 release it will need to be community contributed, or it won't 
happen at all.
> Barry
> ____________________________________________________
> Barry Knapp
> Barry.Knapp at RailInc.com
> office   919.651.5039
> cell       919.995.0396
> MSN     barry25 at hotmail.com 
> AIM      BarryRKnapp
> Yahoo  BarryKnapp
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org
> [mailto:rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Mark Proctor
> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 11:25 AM
> To: Rules Users List
> Subject: Re: [rules-users] Ruleflow groups in decision tables
>
> Someone was just on IRC about that just now, it seems the attributes at 
> the moment are hard coded to salience and activation-group (xor-group, 
> the legacy name).
> So the short answer is no.
> If someone wants to roll up their sleeves what I think is needed is a 
> general ATTRIBUTE column in the same way there are CONDITION columns. 
> The ATTRIBUTE column would allow one or more comma delimeted attribute 
> names. The data cell would then have values to match those delimeted 
> attribute names. Multiple ATTRIBUTE columns should be allowed.
>
> Look forward to the patch :)
>
> Mark
>
> Matija wrote:
>   
>> Hi, is there a way to specify a ruleflow group in an (.xls) decision
>> table (similarly to how you can specify salience or activation
>> groups)? There doesn't seem to be anything about it in the
>> documentation.
>>
>> Barring that, is anyone already working to add this functionality to
>> the decision table parser or is it perhaps a planned feature? Because
>> if not, I may need to look into adding that myself, which is something
>> I'm keen to avoid (plus, I would not like to duplicate other efforts).
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> M.
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>>   
>>     
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20071012/33517e35/attachment.html