[rules-users] BRMS

[Markus Helbig]

tried it for several hours, but hadn't success to get it running ...

2007/10/17, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org>:
> Paul Browne wrote:
> > Haven't tried it in this context , but would using Retroweaver help
> > ?(Java 5 code compiled to work in Java 1.4 JVM)
> It may do, but we don't have the resources to QA this, so its up to the
> community to see if that works.
> >
> > Mark Proctor wrote:
> >> Markus Helbig wrote:
> >>> that's a real pitty ... it's a great thing ... but WebSphere 6.0.x is
> >>> using JRE 1.4 ... damned
> >>>
> >> There are still people out there using drools 2.x because they are on
> >> JDK1.3. But their comes a time when the advantages of moving
> >> outweight the advantages of staying, its not an easy decision but
> >> jdk1.4 has been around since 2003, so I think we've supported it long
> >> enough. Our next major release will be jdk1.5 only, both BRMS and
> >> engine.
> >>> 2007/10/15, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org>:
> >>>
> >>>> Markus Helbig wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> i tryed to deploy the BRMS on a WebSphere Server, but i get
> >>>>> incompatibility errors. It seems BRMS can not be used with JRE 1.4.x,
> >>>>> right? Why? JRE 1.4.x is still very common and often used in
> >>>>> enterprises ...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> yup the BRMS is JDK1.5 - welcome to the future :)
> >>>>
> >>>>> Cheers
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Markus
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Stacktrace is:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Could not be defined due to: (org/jboss/seam/servlet/SeamListener)
> >>>>> bad
> >>>>> major version at offset=6
> >>>>> This is often caused by having a class defined at multiple
> >>>>> locations within the classloader hierarchy.  Other potential causes
> >>>>> include compiling against an older or newer version of the class
> >>>>> that has an incompatible method signature.
> >>>>> Dumping the current context classloader hierarchy:
> >>>>>     ==> indicates defining classloader
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> rules-users mailing list
> >>>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> rules-users mailing list
> >>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> rules-users mailing list
> >>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rules-users mailing list
> >> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>