[rules-users] Re: Drools 4.0.3 Released
Mark Proctor
mproctor at codehaus.org
Wed Oct 24 09:02:38 EDT 2007
J Michael Dean wrote:
> Does 4.0.3 take care of the jdt inclusion problem? Or does this wait
> for 4.1?
jdt inclusion problem, for what? eclipse? That was never a problem, we
just didn't support eclipse 3.3. Anyway this release has a backport of
the eclipse 3.3 code, so no we support 3.2 and 3.3 - neither needs the
eclipse jdt jar in the zip.
>
> - Mike Dean
>
> On Oct 24, 2007, at 12:51 AM, rules-users-request at lists.jboss.org wrote:
>
>> Send rules-users mailing list submissions to
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> rules-users-request at lists.jboss.org
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> rules-users-owner at lists.jboss.org
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of rules-users digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Rules firing with an update of another object (Fabrice Granzotto)
>> 2. Re: [rules-dev] Drools 4.0.3 Released (Mark Proctor)
>> 3. Re: Rules firing with an update of another object (Edson Tirelli)
>> 4. RE: Rules firing with an update of another object
>> (Anstis, Michael (M.))
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 18:11:54 -0400
>> From: Fabrice Granzotto <granz at MIT.EDU>
>> Subject: [rules-users] Rules firing with an update of another object
>> To: rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> Message-ID: <20071023181154.mn0tbxwq1yw0k8kw at webmail.mit.edu>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>
>> Hi everybody!
>>
>> Here is my code and my rule. The problem is that the rule doesn?t
>> detect that
>> my item ?chocolate? contained in the container has moved to the
>> ?office?.
>>
>> I know that if I update the item instead the container it?s working,
>> but I was
>> wondering if there is a solution to detect this movement by this way?
>> Do you
>> have a solution?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> *******CODE *******
>> session = ruleBase.newStatefulSession();
>> Location kitchen=new Location("kitchen");
>> Location office=new Location("office");
>> Container container1=new Container("container1",kitchen);
>> session.insert(container1);
>> Item chocolate=new Item("chocolate", container1);
>> session.insert(chocolate);
>> session.fireAllRules();
>> //No rules fired => OK
>> container1.setLocation(office);
>> session.update(session.getFactHandle(container1), container1);
>> session.fireAllRules();
>> //Once again, no rules fired => Not OK... I want detect this movement
>>
>> *******RULE *******
>> rule "An item is in the office"
>> salience 0
>> when
>> $itemA : Item($cont : container,
>> $cont.location.name=="office")
>> then
>> System.out.println("item in office");
>> end
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:47:41 +0100
>> From: Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org>
>> Subject: [rules-users] Re: [rules-dev] Drools 4.0.3 Released
>> To: Rules Dev List <rules-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> Cc: Rules Users List <rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>> Message-ID: <471E881D.1090900 at codehaus.org>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> Fernando Meyer wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> <http://blog.athico.com/2007/10/drools-403-released.html>
>>>
>>>
>>> We just released Drools v4.0.3
>>> <http://labs.jboss.com/drools/downloads.html>. This is a minor release
>>> with a few improvements on existing features and some bug fixes.
>>>
>>> Release Notes - JBoss Drools - Version 4.0.3
>>>
>>> We would like to really thanks all the contributors that helped on
>>> getting this release out. From those contributing patches and docs, to
>>> those testing and reporting bugs and providing feedback. The list is a
>>> bit long to post all names here and I may incur in a mistake
>>> forgetting someone, so our open public thank you to you all!
>>>
>>> Follows the release notes.
>>>
>>> Happy Drooling
>>> Drools Team
>>>
>>>
>>> Bug
>>>
>>>
>>> * [JBRULES-1264 <http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1264>]
>>> - NPE at BaseObjectClassFieldExtractor.getLongValue with null
>>> fields
>>>
>>> * [ JBRULES-1266 <http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1266>]
>>> - Composite facts types (OR, AND) not rendering correctly
>>>
>>> * [JBRULES-1272 <http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1272>]
>>> - DSL : String index out of range: -1
>>>
>>> * [ JBRULES-1279 <http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1279>]
>>> - Memory leak in release 4.0.2
>>>
>>> * [JBRULES-1281 <http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1281>]
>>> - ExecutorService cannot be shared
>>>
>>> * [ JBRULES-1282 <http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1282>]
>>> - Problems uploading models etc. into the BRMS
>>>
>>> * [JBRULES-1283 <http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1283>]
>>> - Unable to serialize rule base ( NotSerializableException:
>>> org.drools.base.FireAllRulesRuleBaseUpdateListener )
>>>
>>> * [JBRULES-1295 <http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1295>]
>>> - DSL Mapping files does not support comments and empty lines
>>>
>>>
>>> Feature Request
>>>
>>> * [JBRULES-1252 <http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1252>]
>>> - DrlDumper does not dump import functions
>>>
>>>
>>> Task
>>>
>>> * [JBRULES-1260 <http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1260>]
>>> - Include eclipse JDT library in drools-eclipse IDE plugin
>>>
>> Should not that this was a "not fix". heh annoying the way that JIRA
>> still includes rejected items in its reporting.
>>>
>>>
>>> * [ JBRULES-1293 <http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1293>]
>>> - Backport for Eclipse 3.3
>>>
>>> * [JBRULES-1294 <http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1294>]
>>> - Upgrade to MVEL 1.2.10
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Fernando Meyer http://fmeyer.org
>>> JBoss Rules Core Developer
>>> fernando at fmeyer.org <mailto:fernando at fmeyer.org>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>
>>
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20071024/20e86fd6/attachment-0001.html
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 20:57:55 -0300
>> From: "Edson Tirelli" <tirelli at post.com>
>> Subject: Re: [rules-users] Rules firing with an update of another
>> object
>> To: "Rules Users List" <rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>> Message-ID:
>> <e6dd5ba30710231657p5a389911td9c6dcd592f68356 at mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> Hi Fabrice,
>>
>> That is how it is supposed to work... no "automatic" way of doing
>> it in
>> another way.
>>
>> []s
>> Edson
>>
>> 2007/10/23, Fabrice Granzotto <granz at mit.edu>:
>>>
>>> Hi everybody!
>>>
>>> Here is my code and my rule. The problem is that the rule doesn?t
>>> detect
>>> that
>>> my item ?chocolate? contained in the container has moved to the
>>> ?office?.
>>>
>>> I know that if I update the item instead the container it?s working,
>>> but I
>>> was
>>> wondering if there is a solution to detect this movement by this
>>> way? Do
>>> you
>>> have a solution?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> *******CODE *******
>>> session = ruleBase.newStatefulSession();
>>> Location kitchen=new Location("kitchen");
>>> Location office=new Location("office");
>>> Container container1=new Container("container1",kitchen);
>>> session.insert(container1);
>>> Item chocolate=new Item("chocolate", container1);
>>> session.insert(chocolate);
>>> session.fireAllRules();
>>> //No rules fired => OK
>>> container1.setLocation(office);
>>> session.update(session.getFactHandle(container1), container1);
>>> session.fireAllRules();
>>> //Once again, no rules fired => Not OK... I want detect this movement
>>>
>>> *******RULE *******
>>> rule "An item is in the office"
>>> salience 0
>>> when
>>> $itemA : Item($cont : container,
>>> $cont.location.name=="office")
>>> then
>>> System.out.println("item in office");
>>> end
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Edson Tirelli
>> Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer
>> Office: +55 11 3529-6000
>> Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20071023/6d6bc946/attachment-0001.html
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 4
>> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 07:51:08 +0100
>> From: "Anstis, Michael \(M.\)" <manstis1 at ford.com>
>> Subject: RE: [rules-users] Rules firing with an update of another
>> object
>> To: "Rules Users List" <rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>> Message-ID:
>> <6CE83AFC8500B641AE00AC1674A3B4AC037EF8E7 at eu1wam08.warley.ford.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>
>> Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part
>> --------------
>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>> Name: smime.p7s
>> Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
>> Size: 4159 bytes
>> Desc: not available
>> Url :
>> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20071024/afe29c7e/smime.bin
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>> End of rules-users Digest, Vol 11, Issue 102
>> ********************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
More information about the rules-users
mailing list