[rules-users] licensing text
Mark Proctor
mproctor at codehaus.org
Wed Sep 26 15:32:21 EDT 2007
We aren't lawyers, so can't offer legal advice. But all the libraries we
use have compatible licenses, i.e. are not GPL etc. We do allow LGPL.
Mark
Krishnan wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> I am trying to use drools 4.0 for our project and understand the
> licensing agreement for drools. Drools
> uses Apache license where as some of the dependant libraries use New
> BSD and other type of licenses.
> Since I am not a lawyer, does anybody have any idea of any
> implications on any problems related to
> the licenses ?.
>
> Drools use the following libraries
>
> antlr-runtime-3.0.jar
> core-3.2.3.v_686_R32x.jar
> janino-2.5.7.jar
> jsr94-1.1.jar
> jxl-2.4.2.jar
> mvel14-1.2rc1.jar
> xercesImpl-2.4.0.jar
> xml-apis-1.0.b2.jar
> xpp3-1.1.3.4.O.jar
> xstream-1.1.3.jar
>
> (a) Do you guys have the licensing agreement for each of these jars ?
> (b) Also, I tried searching for the websites using their name but some
> of them I am not able to find. IF you
> have the website information for these jars, that will help.
> (c) Has anybody run into any particular licensing issue problem with
> Drools ?.
>
> Any help is appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Krishnan.
>
>
> --
> Sivaramakrishna Iyer Krishnan (Anand)
>
> Never assume the obvious is true.
> - William Safire
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20070926/385e121b/attachment.html
More information about the rules-users
mailing list