[rules-users] Decision table capabilities

Greg Barton greg_barton at yahoo.com
Wed Dec 10 11:24:04 EST 2008


I've wanted this kind of functionality for a while, and if I have a spare month some time and the dev team approves I'll build it in. :)  Don't hold your breath, though.  If you want it quicker, bug the devs.

--- On Wed, 12/10/08, Sowmya Yellamilli <sowmya.yellamilli1 at genpact.com> wrote:

> From: Sowmya Yellamilli <sowmya.yellamilli1 at genpact.com>
> Subject: Re: [rules-users] Decision table capabilities
> To: rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> Date: Wednesday, December 10, 2008, 1:27 AM
> unfortunately not possible
> not only decision tables, across all drools implementations
> 
> because only 'when -- then' is permitted not
> 'otherwise'
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Ravi Krishnamurthy wrote:
> > 
> > Hello:
> > 1) Is it possible to write any if then else kind of
> rule instead of 
> > stating all the possibilities in a decision table.
> > 
> > For example: if a == 25
> >                    print (success)
> >              else if a == 10
> >                    print (not bad)
> >              else
> >                 print (try again)
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Ravi
> >             
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Decision-table-capabilities-tp20930053p20930310.html
> Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


      



More information about the rules-users mailing list