[rules-users] Decision table capabilities
Greg Barton
greg_barton at yahoo.com
Wed Dec 10 11:24:04 EST 2008
I've wanted this kind of functionality for a while, and if I have a spare month some time and the dev team approves I'll build it in. :) Don't hold your breath, though. If you want it quicker, bug the devs.
--- On Wed, 12/10/08, Sowmya Yellamilli <sowmya.yellamilli1 at genpact.com> wrote:
> From: Sowmya Yellamilli <sowmya.yellamilli1 at genpact.com>
> Subject: Re: [rules-users] Decision table capabilities
> To: rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> Date: Wednesday, December 10, 2008, 1:27 AM
> unfortunately not possible
> not only decision tables, across all drools implementations
>
> because only 'when -- then' is permitted not
> 'otherwise'
>
>
>
>
>
> Ravi Krishnamurthy wrote:
> >
> > Hello:
> > 1) Is it possible to write any if then else kind of
> rule instead of
> > stating all the possibilities in a decision table.
> >
> > For example: if a == 25
> > print (success)
> > else if a == 10
> > print (not bad)
> > else
> > print (try again)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ravi
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Decision-table-capabilities-tp20930053p20930310.html
> Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
More information about the rules-users
mailing list