[rules-users] Delimited Number groups filtering ?

[Maxim Veksler]

Hello Again David / List,


I should have probably mentioned that I'm working with Drools 3, I'm not
sure how or "if" this can be implemented in Drools 3 syntax. I've tried to
search Drools 3 documentation and googled for this.

Currently I'm using contains with first finds the age groups then follows to
find the matching Campaing but as I already know what campaign I'm checking
and my intention is to check if this campaign can accept this age group I
would like to reverese the search order...

Ideas are very welcome.



Happy new year everyone !




On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 10:20 PM, David Sinclair <
dsinclair at chariotsolutions.com> wrote:

> u almost had it. This should do it.
>
> Subscriber($age : age)
> Campaign($campaignAgeRangs : listOfAgeRangeCodes)
>  AgeRange(minAge <= $age, max >= $age, code memberOf $campaignAgeRangs)
>
> As far as performance, i would think the former would be faster. This one
> will look at all campaigns regardless if they have an AgeRange that matches.
> The former just looks for an AgeRange, then joins back to the Campaign.
>
> dave
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Maxim Veksler <maxim.veksler at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Thank you very much for the fast and accurate reply David,
>>
>>
>> Is it also possible to use the opposite positioning?, something like:
>>
>> Subscriber($age : age)
>> Campaign($campaignAgeRangs : listOfAgeRangeCodes)
>> AgeRange(minAge <= $age, max >= $age, $campaignAgeRangs contains code)
>>
>>
>> Please don't try the above as this tries to create a field extractor for
>> $campaignAgeRangs on the AgeRange object which fails for obvious reasons..
>>
>> I would like to to filter first by Subscriber, then by Campaign and last
>> by age range. This is obviously a simplification of the actual filtering
>> rules.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 7:28 PM, David Sinclair <
>> dsinclair at chariotsolutions.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Subscriber($age : age)
>>> AgeRange(minAge <= $age, max >= $age, $code : code)
>>> Campaign(listOfAgeRangeCodes contains $code)
>>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Maxim Veksler <maxim.veksler at gmail.com
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The dataModel is as following:
>>>>
>>>> class AgeRange() {
>>>> Integer code;
>>>> int minAge;
>>>> int maxAge;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> Campaign() {
>>>> List<Integer> listOfAgeRangeCodes;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> Subscriber() {
>>>> int age;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> AgeRange()'s and Campaign()'s are pre-populated into the WM.
>>>> Subscriber() is asserted right before fireAllRules is called.
>>>>
>>>> I need a rule that would allow me to check if Subscriber() is within one
>>>> of the defined on the Campaign() AgeRange()'s.
>>>>
>>>> What would be the most efficient way to enforce this constraint?
>>>> The other possibility I see is to store the list of AgeRange()'s in each
>>>> Campaign() and then use eval() to iterate over the list...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Advice and ideas are appreciated.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Maxim.
>>>> --
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Maxim Veksler
>>>>
>>>> "Free as in Freedom" - Do u GNU ?
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> rules-users mailing list
>>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Maxim Veksler
>>
>> "Free as in Freedom" - Do u GNU ?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>


-- 
Cheers,
Maxim Veksler

"Free as in Freedom" - Do u GNU ?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20081231/8581bade/attachment.html