[rules-users] Question about timing rules

[Scott Reed]

To parameterize each rule's frequency, you can add an object with a 
frequency property for each rule or group of rules with the same 
frequency and check the frequency in the LHS against Corniels proposed 
timer object. You can then modify the frequency property of these 
objects and signal the rule engine that the change was made and the new 
frequency will be be used to trigger the rules.

I am not sure you need to fireAllRules periodically. I think you can 
just update the timer object that Corneil proposes and signal the update 
to the rule engine and it will reevaluate the rules automatically.

Corneil du Plessis wrote:
> It should not be an issue to have an object inserted representing the 
> current time and have rules checking against the object
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org 
> [mailto:rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Bagwell, 
> Allen F
> *Sent:* 05 June 2008 17:34
> *To:* Rules Users List
> *Subject:* [rules-users] Question about timing rules
>
>  
> Another noob question:
>  
> Is there a generally understood way of implementing the concept of a 
> time interval rule?
>  
> That is, lets say I have a Drools-enabled client which is constantly 
> receiving information from outside resources. Most of this data (and 
> the consequences of its changes) is time sensitive, so I'm calling the 
> fireAllRules() method in a loop every minute.
>  
> And now, let's say I have a rule that in addition to being driven by 
> incoming data changes has to be linked to a repeating clock interval 
> or synched with wall time such that the rule only activates and fires 
> if the data meets certain parameters AND it's been exactly 1 hour 
> since the last check or that it will fire at the top of every wall 
> time hour (1 PM, 2PM, 3 PM, etc.).
>  
> Furthermore, timing may change. A successful rule activation and 
> firing might do something like "now change this timing so that for the 
> next 24 hours, this rule must be examined every 30 minutes instead of 
> every hour".
>  
> My initial reading of the Drools documetation I came across the 
> Duration, and Date-* keywords. Their descriptions didn't seem to fit 
> the bill.
>  
> I ask this because our old rules engine software that has been retired 
> to obsolescence allowed this kind of thing to be easily set up. Coming 
> at it in the Drools world seems a lot more challenging.
>  
> Thoughts? Examples?
>  
> -Allen
>  
>  
>  
>  
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>