[rules-users] wrapping drools api?

[Mark Proctor]

thomaskukofka at web.de wrote:
> Hello,
>
> some people write about wrapping the Drools API with an own access API 
> for integration in the application.
> Sorry for the perhaps stupid question, but what is the reason for 
> this? Does this only make sense if  I'm thinking about changing the 
> rule engine one day?
yes they do this for rule engine independance.
> If I'm not intending to change the rule engine from Drools to another, 
> so isn't it the same if the developpers has to use the native Drools 
> API or an self-written access API?
>
> Regards
> Tom
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>