[rules-users] RHS start ruleflow not executing associated rules

[djouki]

As you suggested, I ran the faulty process directly. The error was based  in
part 
a misinterpretation of the AND split functionality. It was flowing through
unmatching rules
and terminating the process before other rules had completed. Resolved it
with AND join.
 

Kris Verlaenen wrote:
> 
>> At issue, the rules within the second ruleflow, though activated, are not
>> being executed.
> 
> Do you have a test case that shows this behaviour?  If you open a JIRA and 
> attach the test case, I'll take a look.  Have you tried starting the
> process 
> directly using the startProcess method on the working memory directly? 
> Does 
> this change the situation?  In theory, there should be no difference in 
> starting a process, no matter how you start it.  And ruleflow groups
> should 
> only deactivate if there are no more activated rules in the ruleflow
> group.
> 
> Kris 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/RHS-start-ruleflow-not-executing-associated-rules-tp19804474p19999806.html
Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.