[rules-users] Adding a custom operator to drools?

[Michael Zimmermann]

Please ignore the first question... I found the way to do it using a
custom static operator in my EvaluatorDefinition implementation.

Michael Zimmermann wrote:
> 2) Also, I am wondering about the large number of nearly identical
> internal classes required for each operator.Is there a specific reason
> why such an operator has to be defined for each possible object type
> separately?
> Is this due to the way the InternalReadAccessor is called to map to the
> current datatype in an operator call? And why not just call
> 
> cu, Michael
> 
> PS: Some details about my project come once I find a bit of time to
> write them down coherently :-)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> 
>