[rules-users] Backward chaining in drools 5?

[Mark Proctor]

UPBrandon wrote:
> I have two questions.  First, has any progress been made on "full" backward
> chaining?  I assume it is no longer expected in version 5.
>   
no
> And second, where can I find information on the "from" keyword?  Is that a
> new feature in Drools 5?
>
>   
no it's in 4.0.x. The manual has full details.
> -Brandon
>
>
> Mark Proctor wrote:
>   
>>> I read the information available about drools 5, but support to 
>>> backward chaining is never mentioned. Since in the documentation of 
>>> Drools 4 it's said that it will be supported in the next major release 
>>> I'm wondering wether it will be present in release 5. Does anyone know 
>>> something about it?
>>>       
>> Drools does not yet support full backward chaining. We do however 
>> support the 'from' keyword which allows you to work with out of WM data, 
>> which can help for many use cases.
>>     
>
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20090415/fcdf2d16/attachment.html