[rules-users] Sequential mode help!

[Ross H]

You might need to think about how the rules engine does it job. The first
part is setting up the network to match your conditions, the second is then
executing the consequences of those matched facts.

What your seeing here is the first part finding nulls. So you need to make
sure that all your facts are fully populated if they are being checked in
the conditions, or you need to add conditions that check for null. I think
salience does not come into play until after the facts have been matched.

On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Torfox <bartosz.jankiewicz at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> The Params object is a fact of declared type. A basic iniotiation is
> performed in rule1, but the rule1 is not fired in the first place.
>
> adding another condition that checks policy.params != null in condition of
> rule 2 is not solving my problem that refers to rules ordering algorithm. I
> have hundreds of rules created in decision tables, so I wanted the result
> to
> be simple. I don't really care about efficiency, I just need to run the
> rules in the order given by salience attribute.
>
> Thanks,
> Bartosz
>
>
> I don't see the initialisation of fields modelGroup and region in the
> Params
> fact. They aren't int, but Integer, and so not zero by default.
> -W
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://n3.nabble.com/Sequential-mode-help-tp68511p68755.html
> Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20091205/15491620/attachment.html