[rules-users] Delimited Number groups filtering ?

David Sinclair dsinclair at chariotsolutions.com
Mon Jan 5 13:24:36 EST 2009 

Not sure if memberOf is supported in Drools 3 syntax, but I think this is
what u are trying to do

        $f : FilteringStateConnector(connectorIndex == 4,
            $campaignId : campaignId, $subscriberId : subscriberId)

        // join on campaign ID first
        DynaCampaign(
            code == $campaignId,
            $ageRangeGroups : ageRangeGroups
        )

        $subscriber : DynaSubscriber(id == $subscriberId,
            age != null,
            $subscriberAge : age
        )

        // Locate age group(s) subscriber is categorized within.
        $ageGroup : AgeGroup(lowValue <= $subscriberAge, highValue >=
$subscriberAge,
            code memberOf $ageRangeGroups
        )

On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 2:55 AM, Maxim Veksler <maxim.veksler at gmail.com>wrote:

> Obviously I can.
> Thank you very much David for you motivation to help.
>
>
> Here is the relevant set of rules as it's looks in My Drools3 .drl file:
> (Please see comments after the drl).
>
> """
> rule "4" // Campaign Age Range Groups
>         no-loop
>
>     when
>         $f : FilteringStateConnector(connectorIndex == 4,
>             $campaignId : campaignId, $subscriberId : subscriberId)
>
>         eval ($f.getCampaign().getAgeRangeGroups().size() > 0)
>
>         $subscriber : DynaSubscriber(id == $subscriberId,
>             age != null,
>             $subscriberAge : age
>         )
>         eval(com.ml.common.utils.BooleanLogging.trace(log,  "common.drl R:4
> **** DynaSubscriber()  " + $subscriber))
>
>         // Locate age group(s) subscriber is categorized within.
>         $ageGroup : AgeGroup(lowValue <= $subscriberAge, highValue >=
> $subscriberAge,
>             $ageGroupCode : code
>         )
>         eval(com.ml.common.utils.BooleanLogging.trace(log,  "common.drl R:4
> ******** AgeGroup()  " + $ageGroup))
>
>         // Check if campaign contains this AgeRange Group.
>         DynaCampaign(
>             code == $campaignId,
>             ageRangeGroups contains $ageGroupCode
>         )
>         eval(com.ml.common.utils.BooleanLogging.trace(log,  "common.drl R:4
> AgeGroup verified for Subscriber: " + $subscriberId + " at Campaign: " +
> $campaignId))
>
>     then
>         $f.setPassedRuleRecord("4");
>
>         $f.setConnectorIndex(500);
>         modify($f);
> end
>
> rule "[XOR NO COUNTING RULE] 4" // Campaign AgeGroup
>     when
>         $f : FilteringStateConnector(connectorIndex == 4,
>             $campaignId : campaignId, $subscriberId : subscriberId)
>
>         eval ($f.getCampaign().getAgeRangeGroups().size() == 0)
>
>         eval(com.ml.common.utils.BooleanLogging.trace(log,  "common.drl R:4
> AgeGroup NOT CHECKED for Subscriber: " + $subscriberId + " at Campaign: " +
> $campaignId))
>
>     then
>         $f.setPassedRuleRecord("4");
>
>         $f.setConnectorIndex(500);
>         modify($f);
> end
> """
>
> What I'm trying to do with these 2 rules is check if I need to verify age
> ranges for subscriber, if so [rule "4"] is firing, I already know the
> campaign I'm checking so I would like to first locate it, then fetch it's
> ageRangeGroups and only then check of each of the groups if it matches by
> it's ranges to the subscriber age range - 1 match is enough to stop the
> search.
>
> What I'm doing now is first location all the AgeGroup objects that match
> the subscriber and then check (for each) of the groups is it matches the
> campaign collection.
>
> Please again note that I'm using Drools 3, we're considering here Drools4
> but for now It's hard core 3.
>
>
> Thank you,
> Maxim.
>
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 7:05 PM, David Sinclair <
> dsinclair at chariotsolutions.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm not quite sure if I understand your question. Could you write out the
>> rule(even pseudo-code if necessary), or the something as to try and clarify
>> what you are trying doing?
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Maxim Veksler <maxim.veksler at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Again David / List,
>>>
>>>
>>> I should have probably mentioned that I'm working with Drools 3, I'm not
>>> sure how or "if" this can be implemented in Drools 3 syntax. I've tried to
>>> search Drools 3 documentation and googled for this.
>>>
>>> Currently I'm using contains with first finds the age groups then follows
>>> to find the matching Campaing but as I already know what campaign I'm
>>> checking and my intention is to check if this campaign can accept this age
>>> group I would like to reverese the search order...
>>>
>>> Ideas are very welcome.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Happy new year everyone !
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 10:20 PM, David Sinclair <
>>> dsinclair at chariotsolutions.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> u almost had it. This should do it.
>>>>
>>>> Subscriber($age : age)
>>>> Campaign($campaignAgeRangs : listOfAgeRangeCodes)
>>>>  AgeRange(minAge <= $age, max >= $age, code memberOf $campaignAgeRangs)
>>>>
>>>> As far as performance, i would think the former would be faster. This
>>>> one will look at all campaigns regardless if they have an AgeRange that
>>>> matches. The former just looks for an AgeRange, then joins back to the
>>>> Campaign.
>>>>
>>>> dave
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Maxim Veksler <maxim.veksler at gmail.com
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thank you very much for the fast and accurate reply David,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it also possible to use the opposite positioning?, something like:
>>>>>
>>>>> Subscriber($age : age)
>>>>> Campaign($campaignAgeRangs : listOfAgeRangeCodes)
>>>>> AgeRange(minAge <= $age, max >= $age, $campaignAgeRangs contains code)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Please don't try the above as this tries to create a field extractor
>>>>> for $campaignAgeRangs on the AgeRange object which fails for obvious
>>>>> reasons..
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to to filter first by Subscriber, then by Campaign and
>>>>> last by age range. This is obviously a simplification of the actual
>>>>> filtering rules.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 7:28 PM, David Sinclair <
>>>>> dsinclair at chariotsolutions.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Subscriber($age : age)
>>>>>> AgeRange(minAge <= $age, max >= $age, $code : code)
>>>>>> Campaign(listOfAgeRangeCodes contains $code)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Maxim Veksler <
>>>>>> maxim.veksler at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The dataModel is as following:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> class AgeRange() {
>>>>>>> Integer code;
>>>>>>> int minAge;
>>>>>>> int maxAge;
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Campaign() {
>>>>>>> List<Integer> listOfAgeRangeCodes;
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Subscriber() {
>>>>>>> int age;
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> AgeRange()'s and Campaign()'s are pre-populated into the WM.
>>>>>>> Subscriber() is asserted right before fireAllRules is called.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I need a rule that would allow me to check if Subscriber() is within
>>>>>>> one of the defined on the Campaign() AgeRange()'s.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What would be the most efficient way to enforce this constraint?
>>>>>>> The other possibility I see is to store the list of AgeRange()'s in
>>>>>>> each Campaign() and then use eval() to iterate over the list...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Advice and ideas are appreciated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>> Maxim.
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Maxim Veksler
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Free as in Freedom" - Do u GNU ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> rules-users mailing list
>>>>>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> rules-users mailing list
>>>>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Maxim Veksler
>>>>>
>>>>> "Free as in Freedom" - Do u GNU ?
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> rules-users mailing list
>>>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> rules-users mailing list
>>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> Maxim Veksler
>>>
>>> "Free as in Freedom" - Do u GNU ?
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Maxim Veksler
>
> "Free as in Freedom" - Do u GNU ?
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20090105/564b1171/attachment.html

More information about the rules-users mailing list