[rules-users] Drools, Grails, and default packages for domain objects

[Costello, Robert]

Has anyone else run into issues trying to reference objects in a default
package?  I'm trying to use Drools with Grails and my rule which
compiled nicely in a package setting has issues when faced with a
default package.  

 

The error is "foo" cannot be resolved to a type

 

I've tried putting the rule both in the default package and putting it
in a named package, and neither seem to work.   If I put my objects back
into packages, everything is fine. 

 

Any  advice?

 

Thanks,

 

Robert Costello

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20090119/04393a43/attachment.html