[rules-users] Drools, Grails, and default packages for domain objects

[Costello, Robert]

I'm using the latest as of this date, which is 5.0.0M4

 

Thanks!

 

Robert Costello

Lead Systems Engineer

IMA Performance

E3- 279A

847.286.0910

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Edson Tirelli
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 3:59 PM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Drools, Grails,and default packages for
domain objects

 


   Robert,

   What version of Drools are you using?
   I remember seeing something about this in the past... I will search
JIRAs to see if we have any ticket open for 5.0.

   []s
   Edson

2009/1/19 Costello, Robert <rcost10 at searshc.com>

Has anyone else run into issues trying to reference objects in a default
package?  I'm trying to use Drools with Grails and my rule which
compiled nicely in a package setting has issues when faced with a
default package.  

 

The error is "foo" cannot be resolved to a type

 

I've tried putting the rule both in the default package and putting it
in a named package, and neither seem to work.   If I put my objects back
into packages, everything is fine. 

 

Any  advice?

 

Thanks,

 

Robert Costello

 

 


_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users at lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users




-- 
 Edson Tirelli
 JBoss Drools Core Development
 JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20090120/bd74a630/attachment.html