[rules-users] Guvnor Issues
Herman Post
Herman.Post at imail.org
Thu Jan 22 22:26:20 EST 2009
Thanks for responding. I am evaluating Guvnor for use by non-programmers in my
organization. A programmer can figure out how to work around issues, but
non-programmers become frustrated quickly, so I think this is important.
Are the other two issues I mentioned irrelevant in your opinion?
Thanks,
Herm
From: rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Edson Tirelli
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 6:19 PM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Guvnor Issues
Regarding #3, it is not a Guvnor issue. In fact, if you are declaring types in the DRL file directly, you will face the same limitation. Feel free to open the Jira for #3 against drools-core/drools-compiler. Can't promise I will be able to get to that any time soon, but it is something I think it is worth doing.
[]s
Edson
2009/1/22 Herman Post <Herman.Post at imail.org<mailto:Herman.Post at imail.org>>
Hi,
I've been working with the Model feature in Guvnor 5.M4 and have some questions:
1. Is there a way to delete a fact type once created?
2. When I declare a field as a Date it gets included as a java.lang.Date and the fact will not validate.
3. If I have created two facts, the one created first cannot reference the second one as the type of a field. The second on can reference the first. It would be nice to support this forward -referencing feature.
I'd be happy to enter any of these in Jira if they are not already present (couldn't find them).
Thanks,
Herm
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20090122/af477b24/attachment.html
More information about the rules-users
mailing list