[rules-users] CEP Rule Help Needed

PriyaKathan nash.8103 at gmail.com
Thu Jul 23 09:18:36 EDT 2009


Hi

Find attached  working example for CEP rule with the scenario you stated.
Here I used Psuedo clock.
Hope this would help you to understand better.

Regards,
Priya


2009/7/23 Nestor Tarin Burriel <nestabur at gmail.com>

> Hi again Greg,
>
> I've tried your suggestion and it seems like the facts that is the rule
> checking are the same.
>
> This is my last try:
>
> rule "SnortRuleRetract"
>     dialect "mvel"
>     when
>         $s1 : Snort( sig_name != "(portscan) Open Port")
>         $s2 : Snort ( sig_name != "(portscan) Open Port" , id != $s1.id)
>     then
>         retract($s2);
>         System.out.println(" ********* Deleting from WM");
> end
>
> And is never fired ...
>
> There are no more rules in the package, this is the only one ... so I don't
> understand anything ... could be the error in the engine? I dont retract any
> fact ... as you can see in my code ...
>
> NEStor
>
> 2009/7/23 Nestor Tarin Burriel <nestabur at gmail.com>
>
> Yes, that is the purpose ;)
>>
>> I will try ;)
>>
>> Thanks 4 your help
>>
>>
>> 2009/7/22 Greg Barton <greg_barton at yahoo.com>
>>
>>>
>>> Ah, overlooked that second rule.  Have you tried the overlap operator?
>>>
>>> So, just to clarify, the purpose of the two rules should be:
>>>
>>> SnortRule: If two Snort events that are not port scans of an open port on
>>> the same destination arrive more than 5 minutes apart, delete the earlier
>>> one.
>>>
>>> SnortRuleRetract: If two Snort events that are not port scans of an open
>>> port on any two destinations arrive within 5 minutes of each other, delete
>>> the earlier one.
>>>
>>> Have you tried removing the temporal operators completely, just for
>>> testing purposes?  What happens?  i.e.
>>>
>>> "TimelessSnortRule"
>>>         $s1 : Snort( sig_name != "(portscan) Open Port") from entry-point
>>> "Correlator"
>>>         $s2 : Snort( sig_name != "(portscan) Open Port" , id != $s1.id,
>>> ip_dst == $s1.ip_dst) from entry-point "Correlator"
>>>
>>> "TimelessSnortRuleRetract"
>>>         $s1 : Snort( sig_name != "(portscan) Open Port") from entry-point
>>> "Correlator"
>>>         $s2 : Snort ( sig_name != "(portscan) Open Port" , id != $s1.id)
>>> from entry-point "Correlator"
>>>
>>>
>>> --- On Wed, 7/22/09, Nestor Tarin Burriel <nestabur at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > From: Nestor Tarin Burriel <nestabur at gmail.com>
>>> > Subject: Re: [rules-users] CEP Rule Help Needed
>>> > To: "Rules Users List" <rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>>> > Date: Wednesday, July 22, 2009, 1:47 PM
>>> > Thanks Greg,
>>> >
>>> > As you can see in the code I sent, I have the 2
>>> > implementations:
>>> >
>>> > "SnortRule"
>>> >
>>> >         $s1 : Snort( sig_name !=
>>> > "(portscan) Open Port") from entry-point
>>> > "Correlator"
>>> >
>>> >         $s2 : Snort( sig_name != "(portscan)
>>> > Open Port" , id != $s1.id, ip_dst == $s1.ip_dst, this
>>> > after [5m] $s1) from entry-point "Correlator"
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > "SnortRuleRetract"
>>> >         $s1 : Snort( sig_name !=
>>> > "(portscan) Open Port") from entry-point
>>> > "Correlator"
>>> >         $s2 : Snort ( sig_name != "(portscan)
>>> > Open Port" , id != $s1.id, this after [0m,5m] $s1) from
>>> > entry-point "Correlator"
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > and any of them are thrown
>>> >
>>> > ...
>>> >
>>> > 2009/7/22 Greg Barton <greg_barton at yahoo.com>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Maybe this is a problem of language.  Here's what you
>>> > say the rule should do:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 'After receiving a fact "MyModel" wich name
>>> > != "aaa", if arrives another
>>> >
>>> > with same ip and different id after a
>>> > period between 0 and 5 minutes the
>>> >
>>> > rule have to retract the last one and keep the first
>>> > fact (the older one)'
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Which I would interpret as "Event 1 comes in, then
>>> > event 2 comes in between 0 and 5 minutes later."  Does
>>> > that sound right?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > And here's the rule that you think fits the
>>> > requirements:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > rule "SnortRule"
>>> >
>>> >     salience 2
>>> >
>>> >     dialect "mvel"
>>> >
>>> >     when
>>> >
>>> >         $s1 : Snort( sig_name != "(portscan) Open
>>> > Port") from entry-point "Correlator"
>>> >
>>> >         $s2 : Snort( sig_name != "(portscan) Open
>>> > Port" , id != $s1.id, ip_dst == $s1.ip_dst, this
>>> > after [5m] $s1) from entry-point "Correlator"
>>> >
>>> >     then
>>> >
>>> >         System.out.println("******************
>>> > Snort Alert!!!!" + $s1.getData());
>>> >
>>> >         retract($s1);
>>> >
>>> > end
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Check out the docs, though:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/trunk/target/docs/drools-fusion/html_single/index.html#d0e622
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > The after operator in this case would check that (5m <=
>>> > $s2.startTimestamp - $s1.endTimeStamp <= +infinity).
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > So the rule actually implements "Event 1 comes in,
>>> > then event 2 happens at leat 5 minutes later."
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > If you use the second argument of after I think it would
>>> > work:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > $s2 : Snort( sig_name != "(portscan) Open Port" ,
>>> > id != $s1.id, ip_dst == $s1.ip_dst, this
>>> > after [0m,5m] $s1) from entry-point "Correlator"
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > According to the docs this should check that (0m <=
>>> > $s2.startTimestamp - $s1.endTimeStamp <= 5m).
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > You could alternately use "overlaps".  Place an
>>> > @duration(5m) annotation on the Snort declaration and try
>>> > this condition:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > $s2 : Snort( sig_name != "(portscan) Open Port" ,
>>> > id != $s1.id, ip_dst == $s1.ip_dst, this
>>> > overlaps $s1) from entry-point "Correlator"
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> >
>>> > rules-users mailing list
>>> >
>>> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> >
>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > rules-users mailing list
>>> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>


-- 
Regards,
PriyaKathan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20090723/3e2f87a7/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CEPExample.rar
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 8055 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20090723/3e2f87a7/attachment.obj 


More information about the rules-users mailing list