[rules-users] Using "matches" in Guided Rule Editor (BRL)

[David Sinclair]

What version of Drools are u using?

On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Andrea H.
<Andrea.Hackmann at t-systems.com>wrote:

>
> Dear all,
> I have a problem when using the operator "matches" in the Guided Rule
> Editor.
> I can use the operator from the drop down list, but when saving the rule,
> the tabs "BRL Source" and "Generated DRL" show me that the operator has not
> been used at all. Instead, the "operator" tag is left out completely in the
> BRL source.
> If I choose a different operator, e.g. "is equal to", save, and switch back
> to "matches" (and save again), than the BRL source still shows the operator
> "==".
> If I however edit the BRL source itself to contain "matches", the rule
> works
> fine in my application.
> Strange enough, if I use "and matches" in a multi-part-condition on one
> attribute, there does not seem to be this problem (the BRL says "&amp;&amp;
> matches"). It seems to be only a problem if the "matches" operator comes in
> the first assertion line for an attribute.
> I would be really grateful if anyone had an idea on this behaviour, since I
> seem to be quite lost!
> Thanks in advance,
> Andrea
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Using-%22matches%22-in-Guided-Rule-Editor-%28BRL%29-tp22438549p22438549.html
> Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20090310/5caebc43/attachment.html