[rules-users] Re: Testing out Type Declarations in simple rule file causing exceptions
CK
chrisckc at gmail.com
Sun Mar 15 14:17:10 EDT 2009
I'm trying to login to JIRA and it won't let me. I was able to login
and get/edit my profile/preferences. But once I click on any link out
of the profile section (ie. go to the drools section or the jira
place), it automatically shows that I'm not logged in. When I try to
log in, it won't let me.
I'll try again later, but if I can't login, I won't be able to create
a Jira issue. :X
-ck
On Mar 15, 2009, at 6:10 AM, Edson Tirelli wrote:
>
> There were some changes in the latest MVEL release making it more
> strict on type resolution. We caught most of the scenarios and
> changed the code accordingly, but we probably missed this one.
>
> Could you please open a JIRA with this description of the
> problem? I will fix it asap.
>
> Thanks,
>
> []s
> Edson
>
> 2009/3/15 CK <chrisckc at gmail.com>
> So I did further testing and I was able to narrow it down.
>
> Somehow the culprit is with the import statements. My DRL file has
> a package name of:
>
> package com.test.abc
> dialect "mvel"
>
> So, it appears that in drools using MVEL, a fully qualified name is
> required to instantiate the class? It's quite strange though.
> Considering that I'm following the docs, I should be able to
> dynamically create a new type declaration instance without
> qualifying it.
>
> The following somehow works:
>
> then
> insert(new com.test.abc.Domestic());
> end
>
> Why is drools/mvel being so strict?
>
> -ck
>
>
> On Mar 15, 2009, at 4:23 AM, CK wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering if I am doing something wrong in my code:
>
> I create dummy type declarations to indicate presence of certain
> states (is there possibly a better way of doing this?):
>
> declare Domestic
> dummy : boolean
> end
>
> declare Multiple
> dummy : boolean
> end
>
> rule "..."
> when
> ......
> then
> insert(new Domestic());
> end
>
>
> Something like this is giving me the following errors during DRL
> file parsing:
>
> Unable to build expression for 'consequence': Failed to compile: 1
> compilation error(s):
> - (0,0) could not resolve class: Domestic ' insert(new Domestic());
>
>
> Based on what the docs say, this should generate the proper dynamic
> classes and I should immediately be able to use the declared types.
>
> I did additional checking by outputting the registered Type
> Declarations. These two types are indeed registered in the
> PackageBuilder.getPackage().getTypeDeclarations().
>
> So I can only guess that either I'm doing something wrong here or
> there is a bug in the CR1 release.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
> --
> Edson Tirelli
> JBoss Drools Core Development
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20090315/7a7d9b42/attachment.html
More information about the rules-users
mailing list