[rules-users] build Drools packages

[Wolfgang Laun]

I don't know whether this is the "better (than rule templates) generic way"
you
are hinting at, but I've been extending the template mechanism with a
feature
permitting expansion from objects - maps or bean-style. This means that
you can take a rule template file and instantiate its rule(s) from a
collection of
such objects.

Is this closer to what you're looking for?

-W

2009/3/30 Meny Kobel <meny.kobel at gmail.com>

> Hi,
> Could you please advice which is the best way to build Drools packages?
> I need to read the rules from database and I have to build drools packages.
> The content of the rules is very flexible :
> 1. I don't know the number of rules.
> 2. I don't know rule data: the type name, operation and value.
> 3. I do know the maximum number of types and operations the system support.
>
> How should I build the packages:
> Should I write component that will read the rules from database and will
> transform it to drl file?
> Any API I can use - Maybe BRMS API?
>
> I'm a ware of "rule templates" but I need a better generic way...
>
>
> Thanks,
> Meny
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20090330/fe6dc7f0/attachment.html